Recent Topics
Foam gun?
by demarpaint
02/13/16 06:47 AM
How do you wash your tomatoes ?
by Merkava_4
02/13/16 05:26 AM
Ground effect
by mjoekingz28
02/13/16 04:36 AM
20w50 thick? i present to you Penrite's 50w70!
by FordCapriDriver
02/13/16 03:46 AM
08 caravan / oil seeping from spark plug
by Mark72
02/12/16 11:25 PM
Holley Accelerator pump probem
by nwjones18
02/12/16 10:56 PM
Sealant for threaded air hose fittings.
by BigD1
02/12/16 10:37 PM
on line data search programs - which is best?
by bmwjohn
02/12/16 10:11 PM
What size air compressor is needed
by ram_man
02/12/16 09:45 PM
DHS wants to force car owners to use OEM parts
by faltic
02/12/16 08:54 PM
Castrol Edge 5w30 no longer A5/B5
by slacktide_bitog
02/12/16 08:20 PM
Best Oil Analysis?
by countryboy9799
02/12/16 07:28 PM
Newest Members
wdleighton1, RTS, jhmed80, engus, Rob_Pol
56902 Registered Users
Who's Online
52 registered (BigCahuna, AlienBug, 2002 Maxima SE, Al, BlueOvalFitter, 04SE, 4 invisible), 803 Guests and 109 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
56902 Members
66 Forums
244629 Topics
3984716 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 734
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 10w-40 PYB
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 253
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 51,500km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Fram XG10575

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 16698
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
I just ordered a chicken and an egg from the Internet; will let you know which came first. smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top