Recent Topics
Jws3309 spec for Toyota t -iv?
by zach1900
50 minutes 43 seconds ago
Backing into parking spots
by mclasser
Today at 07:23 PM
CV Grease vs Normal GC-LB Grease
by nobb
Today at 07:18 PM
Finally found a good automatic battery charger
by 901Memphis
Today at 07:08 PM
could an STP oil filter go 10k oci?
by GumbyJarvis
Today at 06:47 PM
Headlight Polish/Cleaner
by Milkman
Today at 06:25 PM
1st Blackstone lab report: High sodium/potassium?
by musc
Today at 05:45 PM
hard to fuel up????
by leroyd92
Today at 05:15 PM
Durability of Dexos 1 5W-30
by Merkava_4
Today at 04:59 PM
snap ring plyers
by edwardh1
Today at 04:55 PM
prime guard jobber cut. impressive
by Bigdaddyeasy
Today at 04:39 PM
Oil Filter Wrench for Acura MDX
by kjbock
Today at 03:39 PM
Newest Members
Warwagon, SWFL, frodo84, eric4ok, H_Town
54918 Registered Users
Who's Online
118 registered (901Memphis, 2009Edge, Al, 4G63Ryan, andrewlg, 4ever4d, 12 invisible), 1787 Guests and 88 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54918 Members
66 Forums
235356 Topics
3786740 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 660
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 10w-40 PYB
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 243
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 48,500km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Wix 57502

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 15706
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
HORSE: You can lead a human to knowledge, but you can't make him think critically! smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top