Recent Topics
Harvard Debate Team Loses to New York Prison Team
by javacontour
10/07/15 03:42 PM
Lubegard ATF Red in DEX III AW4
by thescreensavers
10/07/15 01:06 PM
2006 Toyota Sequoia oil recommendation.
by wolfehunter
10/07/15 01:06 PM
severe service
by wjli
10/07/15 12:37 PM
TiVo Question
by DBMaster
10/07/15 12:29 PM
Verizon: Samsung Galaxy S6 or... ?
by Quattro Pete
10/07/15 11:45 AM
Uses for spent Coolant?
by spavel6
10/07/15 11:14 AM
How do you think this would have turn out w/o CCW
by stockrex
10/07/15 10:39 AM
Warren introduces first API 0W-16 synthetic
by Tom NJ
10/07/15 10:32 AM
Changed Interior Bulbs To LED
by 2015_PSD
10/07/15 10:28 AM
Ford fiesta electric steering
by Rust_Belt_Pete
10/07/15 09:52 AM
drain plug torque
by mobilaltima
10/07/15 09:14 AM
Newest Members
xpablo, ukeyowl, rnl, peejaycruiser, superviking
55613 Registered Users
Who's Online
91 registered (AlaskaMike, 97f150, Alfred_B, Al, 2015_PSD, 2KBMW, 12 invisible), 1710 Guests and 139 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
55613 Members
66 Forums
238672 Topics
3853920 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline

Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 688
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 10w-40 PYB
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline

Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 250
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
2013 F-150 5.0L 51,500km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Fram XG10575

#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline

Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 16054
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.

Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
Sometimes brilliant and intelligent minds do not shine on standardized tests because they do not have standardized minds smile

#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline

Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.