Recent Topics
Featherlite weed eater head seizure
by 97f150
14 minutes 12 seconds ago
G-Oil 2-Cycle Bio-Syn. Engine Oil - 16 oz. $2.50
by Warstud
26 minutes 28 seconds ago
Im ready for a "atta -boy"
by OtisBlkR1
52 minutes 32 seconds ago
Good cars with Atkins cycle mod'fd eng.s+Questions
by ueberooo
Today at 04:51 PM
Campy crank threads L. or R. thread?
by daves66nova
Today at 04:50 PM
05 ford expedition changing brake question
by MetalSlug
Today at 04:44 PM
Shell Rotella T6 on sale+Menards rebate thru 7/27
by 6x6man
Today at 04:37 PM
should I use my last Purolator Classic ?
by Wheel
Today at 04:30 PM
98 corolla clicks then no power, looses charge
by ziggy
Today at 04:17 PM
Applying wax/ sealant but not buffing it off?
by D189379
Today at 04:12 PM
MOTOMASTER TIRES
by Indy
Today at 03:38 PM
Delvac 1300 old flow
by simplistic
Today at 03:23 PM
Newest Members
Mattz, Iroll, CMTG, Kneedragger37, Constantly
50713 Registered Users
Who's Online
107 registered (901Memphis, 97f150, adio, 57ChevyLS, 2004tdigls, 13Tacoma, 9 invisible), 2065 Guests and 261 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
50713 Members
64 Forums
216647 Topics
3409401 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 474
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 5w-50 M1EP
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-50 M1EP
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 228
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 30,000km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Motorcraft FL-500s

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 14019
Loc: Midwest
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
We're all mature until someone pulls out bubblewrap and starts popping it! smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top