Recent Topics
Brake fluid for '11 Buick Regal
by Benzadmiral
03/30/15 09:13 AM
Rounded bolt removal
by dlundblad
03/30/15 09:05 AM
53 inch RC helicopter.
by OtisBlkR1
03/30/15 08:06 AM
Honda Recommended Greases and Lubricants list
by ledslinger
03/30/15 07:58 AM
Stand by..................
...............

by CourierDriver
03/30/15 07:20 AM
opinions on OBD lock device?
by ioci
03/30/15 06:45 AM
Milwaukee Twins Motorcycle Oil
by rccsofla
03/30/15 05:33 AM
Honda Pro Moly 60 Paste has been replaced
by ledslinger
03/30/15 04:18 AM
oil spec data
by SLATRON
03/30/15 01:37 AM
Honda 22 Year Old Lead Engineer !
by HTSS_TR
03/30/15 12:42 AM
full fluid replace + Lubegard. Results timeframe?
by henrys_dad
03/29/15 11:24 PM
My phone don't notice my sim card no mo'
by daves66nova
03/29/15 11:10 PM
Newest Members
fly4food84, 91er, Bear49, Dougsts, Gokatta
53365 Registered Users
Who's Online
88 registered (ABomb369, -SyN-, 55Test, andx0r, 01_celica_gt, 2002 Maxima SE, 7 invisible), 1594 Guests and 165 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
53365 Members
66 Forums
228900 Topics
3658111 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 603
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 5w-50 M1EP
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 238
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 46,000km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Wix 57502

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 15124
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
Technically speaking, if you don't cut the cake and eat it with a fork, are you only eating one piece? smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top