Recent Topics
New Supertech jugs?
by dlundblad
06/26/16 06:16 AM
Fram ph3657 cut open
by jhellwig
06/26/16 05:07 AM
Don't discount coal for a long while yet...
by Shannow
06/26/16 03:10 AM
Decent Wireless Computer Headset?
by 99Saturn
06/25/16 11:41 PM
Need Fuel Pump Assembly for Camry
by Nick1994
06/25/16 11:36 PM
2015 Accord V6 VCM engine UOA 36,680 mi / 9812 OCI
by TNM1982
06/25/16 10:55 PM
Why did Toyota recommend a winter and summer oil?
by BrianApp
06/25/16 10:00 PM
Fram TG 7317 6k miles
by bbhero
06/25/16 09:57 PM
Sta-Lube Moly-Graph Grease
by JHZR2
06/25/16 09:20 PM
Dead battery locks me out of Altima!
by Tom NJ
06/25/16 08:56 PM
Second lawn mower blade
by greasegunn
06/25/16 08:11 PM
Echo weed trimmer - carb issue?
by ryan2022
06/25/16 07:13 PM
Newest Members
paul2005tb, Martyaus, carmelo, Shellman, SSO
58272 Registered Users
Who's Online
50 registered (BobFout, bbhero, alcyon, b1amgm47, car51, BigRalphie, 2 invisible), 967 Guests and 15 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58272 Members
66 Forums
250821 Topics
4110927 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 770
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 15w-40 Delvac 1300
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 5w-20 PP
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 254
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 51,500km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Fram XG10575

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 17241
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
Somehow your attitude seems to have improved after, but not before, my last cup of coffee. smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top