Recent Topics
cam/lifter survival vs distributor gear survival
by montez27
12/01/15 12:46 AM
Question about leaving heat on
by boostedtsiawd
12/01/15 12:25 AM
Filter For A Sludged Engine?
by Farmer
12/01/15 12:15 AM
Prestone ATF + Stop Leak in P/S
by SavagePatch
12/01/15 12:09 AM
Modding your car
by ram_man
11/30/15 11:06 PM
High fuel consumption
by Lolvoguy
11/30/15 10:59 PM
Fixing a cracked wheel?
by RamFan
11/30/15 10:50 PM
2011 Fusion PU 0W-20 with Liqui-Moly MOS2 11.6k
by SubieRubyRoo
11/30/15 10:49 PM
What oil do you run in your "Built" motors?
by BrocLuno
11/30/15 10:49 PM
Steering seems stiff
by Toaster_Jer
11/30/15 10:23 PM
Best way to repair plastic gas tank on snow blower
by ram_man
11/30/15 09:18 PM
Engine compartment AC problems
by Gebo
11/30/15 09:11 PM
Newest Members
bubu, Pheelingphine, Btown, ILLM, flysaab
56177 Registered Users
Who's Online
36 registered (berniedd, 01_celica_gt, Atesz792, 3800Series, Bandito440, bbhero, 3 invisible), 617 Guests and 108 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
56177 Members
66 Forums
241296 Topics
3909552 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline

Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 710
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 10w-40 PYB
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline

Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 251
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
2013 F-150 5.0L 51,500km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Fram XG10575

#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline

Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 16386
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.

Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
Sign seen in a coffee shop: "No WiFi here. Pretend it is 1995 when people had REAL conversations." smile

#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline

Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.