Recent Topics
The next gen electric car?
by Volvohead
09/01/14 03:31 PM
Fram TG3506 Cut Open
by NMBurb02
09/01/14 03:30 PM
1998 Corolla Catalytic Converter Compatability
by 01_celica_gt
09/01/14 03:25 PM
Bosch Premium 3423 Cut Open (Money Shots Only)
by NMBurb02
09/01/14 03:05 PM
Ac issue on focus STILL!!
by ram_man
09/01/14 02:37 PM
snow tires for sale
by bdzik
09/01/14 02:30 PM
1995 Toyota Tercel DX, 260,000 kms.
by Speed_Racer
09/01/14 02:26 PM
Bosch Premium 3331 Cut Open
by NMBurb02
09/01/14 02:26 PM
Paint "bubbling"
by Joe_Power
09/01/14 01:44 PM
08 Lexus LS460 - QS 5W20 Ult. Durabilty - 6k miles
by Lexusguy
09/01/14 01:38 PM
Changing Smart phone plans - Which one??
by Joe_Power
09/01/14 01:33 PM
Honda mower oil question.....
by Clubber_Lang
09/01/14 01:24 PM
Newest Members
Lexusguy, atomb, snapple37, Speed_Racer, DennisWaller
51164 Registered Users
Who's Online
116 registered (01_celica_gt, 1foxracing, 147_Grain, 123Saab, 1345, 29662, 13 invisible), 2024 Guests and 206 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51164 Members
64 Forums
218640 Topics
3447487 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 476
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 5w-50 M1EP
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-50 M1EP
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 229
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 36,000km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Motorcraft FL-500s

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 14401
Loc: Midwest
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
"IDIOTITiS: Causes the brain to shut down and the mouth to keep talking. Thousands affected. Best defense, slap and run." Donald Duck smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top