Recent Topics
My mpg went down after I removed catalytic convert
by boostedtsiawd
2 minutes 42 seconds ago
15 Forester 0w-20 or 0w-30 ok per Mobil 1 site?
by GravelRoad
30 minutes 0 seconds ago
12-pack Wix 51334 (51334MP) prob won't get them
by spackard
Today at 11:45 AM
Longevity of this type of mower or other OPE
by Blaze
Today at 10:37 AM
Cree TW 60w LED (93 CRI) - Home Depot - $7.02/bulb
by sdude2k2000
Today at 10:28 AM
Woman intentionally runs over & kills motorcyclist
by LoneRanger
Today at 09:57 AM
How does MM work.
by PeterGreen
Today at 09:41 AM
Value of old Machinist apprenticeship volume.
by Vern_in_IL
Today at 08:29 AM
Havoline Conventional 5w20
by oilchangeguy
Today at 08:24 AM
HELLA Twin Trumpet High/Low Tone Horn Kit for $19
by Tony_Mack
Today at 08:11 AM
Tecsun PL 680- Will it come to the U.S.?
by Vern_in_IL
Today at 08:03 AM
JCB land speed record - with a backhoe engine
by Shannow
Today at 04:04 AM
Newest Members
John369, GravelRoad, Indy2door, asus389, lessergod
54163 Registered Users
Who's Online
73 registered (aquariuscsm, AZjeff, Atesz792, 4wheeldog, 3800Series, bdcardinal, 5 invisible), 2028 Guests and 74 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54163 Members
66 Forums
232044 Topics
3720446 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 627
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 10w-40 PYB
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 240
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 47,000km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Wix 57502

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 15392
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
I decided to go on a road trip and not come back 'till I ran out of money...got as far as the end of the driveway and came back. smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top