Recent Topics
MK7 GTI
by thr_wedge
49 minutes 46 seconds ago
Real Motorcycle Dealers vs. "Power Sports" Dealers
by LoneRanger
Today at 07:50 AM
Our Sony 5 disk changer DVD player
by Oldmoparguy1
Today at 07:41 AM
JASO vs. Auto Oil for non-wet clutch Powersports
by coachvonyo
Today at 07:31 AM
Why Does Some Oil in Engine Smell "Worse"?
by Miller88
Today at 07:28 AM
Kevlar covered v-belt question.
by mrsilv04
Today at 07:06 AM
1991 yamaha xt600 NY registration questions.
by joegreen
Today at 06:18 AM
postal LLV wiper switch arm broke off
by Tuffy1760
Today at 05:07 AM
2GR-FE Water Pump Noise
by The Critic
Today at 03:36 AM
Castrol & Shell oil sale in Oz
by SR5
Today at 02:45 AM
UOA Mobil Delvac MX 15w40?
by nyumski
Today at 02:13 AM
2015 Silverado - Put some chrome
by Realtech214
Yesterday at 10:22 PM
Newest Members
myfarmertan, coachvonyo, ionix, Amtecol, DRAX392
57779 Registered Users
Who's Online
90 registered (99EscortFTW, Bandito440, ag_ghost, 2015_PSD, Alfred_B, Al, 11 invisible), 1651 Guests and 305 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
57779 Members
66 Forums
248399 Topics
4061924 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 746
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 10w-40 PYB
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-40 Delo 400LE
'09 Honda Fit LX 5w-20 PP
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 254
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 51,500km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Fram XG10575

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 16948
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
Some days I amaze myself. The other days I leave the keys in the Refrigerator. smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top