Recent Topics
Find Topics I Started
by BlueOvalFitter
07/30/14 01:49 PM
Conversions
by OneEyeJack
07/30/14 01:32 PM
Silkolene or Motul
by LTD
07/30/14 01:30 PM
Women and guns
by Hokiefyd
07/30/14 01:01 PM
Doing the math: BYOF vs Shop Fluids
by SwedishRider
07/30/14 12:44 PM
Are the 2002-vintage Northstars something to avoid
by redhat
07/30/14 12:07 PM
How hot is too hot for EOT?
by Griz95
07/30/14 11:29 AM
Mix my own dexos1??
by wolf_06
07/30/14 09:46 AM
Avoid FedEx
by Touring5
07/30/14 09:45 AM
New vehicle protocol
by Mfrank84
07/30/14 09:13 AM
Four Baldwin BT223 oil filters
by NormanBuntz
07/30/14 09:13 AM
UOA: 02 WRX 5MT, 40K - Valvoline "cocktail" 80w90
by Buffman
07/30/14 08:37 AM
Newest Members
gsniegow, dimaone, CaddymanLNL, geovanni, LTD
50806 Registered Users
Who's Online
114 registered (AandPDan, 94astro, AlaskaMike, 2KBMW, 1foxracing, 10 invisible), 2120 Guests and 237 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
50806 Members
64 Forums
217041 Topics
3417367 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 474
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 5w-50 M1EP
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-50 M1EP
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 228
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 30,000km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Motorcraft FL-500s

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 14122
Loc: Midwest
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
I told a chemistry joke....there was no reaction. smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top