Recent Topics
Just looked at the new 2015 Ford Mustangs.
by wtd
10/31/14 04:29 PM
Dex 4 plus additive pkg makes Dex 6 ?
by CKN
10/31/14 04:29 PM
Is Motorcraft orange coolant really just Dexcool?
by wtd
10/31/14 04:21 PM
Converting to Fram Synthetic Filter & Penzoil Plat
by OlPalGary
10/31/14 04:11 PM
Engine failure because of oil filter?
by dlundblad
10/31/14 03:57 PM
Strange transmission behavior
by spencertimm
10/31/14 03:52 PM
14 inch cheap rims for winter
by andrewp1998
10/31/14 03:41 PM
VAG 1.8T Guru
by 2008wrx
10/31/14 03:39 PM
Mazda Mx-5 2012,mazda oil synth 0w20 5683km
by Baveux
10/31/14 03:33 PM
True Confessions
by leeharvey418
10/31/14 03:00 PM
Nun in a Taxi
by Kestas
10/31/14 02:59 PM
Cruise Ctrl on Rushmore Road Kings
by LoneRanger
10/31/14 02:56 PM
Newest Members
Thourun, Zach72, SandCastle, ymc226, redwoods73
51758 Registered Users
Who's Online
93 registered (01rangerxl, 123Saab, 2010_FX4, AITG, andersd, 3800Series, 10 invisible), 1532 Guests and 185 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51758 Members
64 Forums
221477 Topics
3502368 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 495
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 5w-50 M1EP
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-50 M1EP
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 233
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 41,000km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Wix 57502

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 14659
Loc: Midwest
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
Just pour the coffee and back away slowly! smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top