Recent Topics
Craftsman Snowblower 247.88955
by Droopy
11/24/14 09:45 AM
GY Ultra Grip GW-3 or Firestone Winterforce
by Blue_Goose
11/24/14 09:37 AM
Oriellys MGL51372 cut open
by DSparks
11/24/14 08:46 AM
many ACEA a5/b5 and a3/b4 only api SL
by shDK
11/24/14 06:23 AM
New Plugs are Powdery Black. w/PIC. Diagnosis?
by Turk
11/24/14 05:14 AM
Looking for new oil/oil filter combo..
by radtech91
11/23/14 11:13 PM
Best atf for volvo 4t65ev/gt
by pjc360
11/23/14 10:43 PM
A New Cert mark for ILSAC GF-6B?
by wemay
11/23/14 10:24 PM
APPLES
by JHZR2
11/23/14 09:42 PM
where is the best deal on Dexron VI ?
by LScowboy
11/23/14 09:33 PM
Engines designed around oil?
by Throt
11/23/14 09:30 PM
Battery sprung a leak!
by JHZR2
11/23/14 09:30 PM
Newest Members
kinder, SamBruin7, splatt, Lars65inc, dothedrew1202
51984 Registered Users
Who's Online
85 registered (1999nick, 4wheeldog, 123Saab, 1 FMF, 440Magnum, 9 invisible), 1624 Guests and 140 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51984 Members
66 Forums
222545 Topics
3522498 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3266114 - 01/31/14 05:04 PM MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III
Cardenio327 Offline


Registered: 11/30/09
Posts: 508
Loc: Oaxaca, Mexico
I'm having a bit of trouble with a Rotary Lift brand rolling jack and am encountering conflicting information in the operating manuals.

The Rotary Lift four post alignment rack on which the rolling jack is mounted is powered by an Italian built "Global" power head which is serviced with Dexron III. The operator's manual for the rack specifies that the rolling jack should also be serviced with Dexron III.

The operator's manual for the rolling jack specifies it should be serviced with MIL-H-5606, which is also dyed red. I suppose the rack's manual is trying to say Dexron can be used for topping off, while the jack's manual specifies MIL-H-5606 as a factory fill and for refilling.

How great are the benefits of using MIL-H-5606 over Dexron III? I'm going to assume the only benefits of using Dexron III would be cost and availability.

If I order the MIL-H-5606 from one of the jobbers that supplies me it will be a 5 gallon bucket, $$$, the jack's capacity is about 2-1/2 qts. I suppose I could stop by an airport and try to buy it, $$$.

I have cleaned the pump and reservoir out completely by hand and they now contain Mobil Dexron IIIh.
_________________________
'08 Honda C90ST Super Cub 5w-50 M1EP
'08 Honda NX4 Falcon 5w-50 M1EP
'09 Honda Fit LX 10w-30 QSUD
'99 F-150 W/T 4.2L 10w-30 QSUD

Top
#3266205 - 01/31/14 06:57 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
Joseph_S37 Offline


Registered: 03/21/10
Posts: 233
Loc: Alberta, Canada
I would say the real difference is that the Dex will have "friction" properties in the additives, due to it being a transmission fluid, where as the 5606 is purely a hydraulic fluid.

I doubt it will make any noticeable difference, but I can't comment from experience.
_________________________
2013 F-150 5.0L 41,000km
Penz Platinum 5W-20 || Wix 57502

Top
#3266238 - 01/31/14 07:33 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 14699
Loc: Iowegia
Let's not forget that ATF IS a special hydraulic fluid.

The MIL 5606 is nothing more than a mineral base hydraulic oil with a minimum 100C viscosity spec of 4.9 cSt.

DexronIII has a 100C viscosity spec of 7.5 cSt.

Unless this system is used for fire prevention, Run DexIIIH or any Dexron/Mercon fluid without worry.


Edited by MolaKule (01/31/14 07:39 PM)
_________________________
My bed is where I suddenly remember all the things I was supposed to do today. smile

Top
#3322356 - 03/24/14 07:14 PM Re: MIL-H-5606 vs. Dexron III [Re: Cardenio327]
MoGas Offline


Registered: 01/10/11
Posts: 5
Loc: AZ
We used MIL-H-5606 for aircraft hydraulic systems in the Navy. Probably overkill in this case.

Top