Gumout Q&A

click here to participate in the Gumout Q&A

Recent Topics
0w30 and 0W40 semisynth - Canadians again.
by Shannow
04/19/15 04:21 AM
AAP $50 off $100
by faramir9
04/19/15 12:47 AM
Torque Measurment and Application
by Y_K
04/19/15 12:41 AM
Oil filter in relation to oil pump....
by gregk24
04/18/15 11:27 PM
Quick "?" on OEM NGK s.p. wires
by 97tbird
04/18/15 11:13 PM
Oil Stash, Formula Shell Syn/blend
by JHogan
04/18/15 10:51 PM
Bought a new Silverado
by Jim74
04/18/15 10:28 PM
Same restriction gauge for multiple vehicles?
by Klutch9
04/18/15 10:21 PM
Oil change tomorrow M1 0w40 vs Castrol 0w40
by Ndx
04/18/15 10:10 PM
Amazon Fire Phone....thoughts?
by gregk24
04/18/15 09:31 PM
low rolling resistance tires on 2012 Impala
by NJM1965
04/18/15 08:51 PM
Tire PSI FJ Cruiser - Load Range E
by Nick1994
04/18/15 08:44 PM
Newest Members
kemtho, Tkonrr, Remy_Marten, tassie, sooberoo
53636 Registered Users
Who's Online
29 registered (Bama, BobsArmory, Bookmaker, Bandito440, bigt61, 4 invisible), 621 Guests and 205 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
53636 Members
66 Forums
229967 Topics
3679768 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3256421 - 01/22/14 03:02 PM MIT future lubrication direction preso.
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 28529
Loc: a prisoner island
Presentation on the early stages of a lubricant optimisation programme from the MIT.

I'm impressed with the mid stroke viscosity optimisation concept to keep the viscosity up at the stroke ends (reduced boundary lubrication), while reducing the viscosity mid stroke where full hydrodynamic is in play.

Interesting (obvious 'though) on additive concentration in aras of oil volatising off...explains why volatility is important, and why the tests ARE representative of whathappens in an engine (hint, it's not about crankcase ventilation).

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/deer_2012/friday/presentations/deer12_wong.pdf

Top
#3256490 - 01/22/14 04:09 PM Re: MIT future lubrication direction preso. [Re: Shannow]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 15962
Loc: Sunny Florida
Why wouldn't we eventually end up with something like Delphi/GM's patented magnetorheological fluid one day?
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3256493 - 01/22/14 04:10 PM Re: MIT future lubrication direction preso. [Re: Shannow]
Eddie Offline


Registered: 12/07/03
Posts: 7085
Loc: Florida, Cape Coral
tHANKS SHANNOW. a LARGE AMOUNT OF INFORMATION/DATA IN THE PAPER. Ops caps were on. Ed
_________________________
CX5 Touring 2.5L :-)

Top
#3256535 - 01/22/14 05:22 PM Re: MIT future lubrication direction preso. [Re: Shannow]
JAG Offline


Registered: 10/23/05
Posts: 4550
Loc: Fredericksburg, VA
I too liked the concept of differentially altering liner temps. so viscosity is increased at the ends. Polymer VIIs can have a similar effect, at least qualitatively, since temporary shear thinning is greater mid-stroke than near the ends due to the piston velocity profiles. Keep HTHS constant by lowering base oil viscosity and increasing polymer concentration. That would increase temporary shear thinning, maintain true viscosity mid-stroke and increase true viscosity near stroke ends. Thanks Shannow.

Top
#3256545 - 01/22/14 05:37 PM Re: MIT future lubrication direction preso. [Re: Shannow]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 28529
Loc: a prisoner island
JAG, I was thinking the same in the shower this morning...about shear thinning that is.

Top