Recent Topics
1997 Shell Product Data Book - XHVI Lubes
by Shannow
10 minutes 48 seconds ago
Kohler engine likes to burn oil as much as gas.
by cwatkin
Yesterday at 11:19 PM
Front wheel bearing issue
by JHZR2
Yesterday at 11:13 PM
Preferences
by 01_celica_gt
Yesterday at 10:49 PM
91 Civic Hatch 3dr Si coolant hose
by Gito
Yesterday at 10:19 PM
Who rev matches their downshifts?
by Klutch9
Yesterday at 09:41 PM
'08 BMW 328xi, BMW 5W30, 10.5k OCI, 57k vehicle
by grumpyoldman
Yesterday at 09:35 PM
1 yr, 3 yr, 5yr or since inception?
by bustednutz
Yesterday at 08:45 PM
2009 Mustang 4.0 Tremec fluid
by Skeet6
Yesterday at 08:35 PM
where to order slip on rocker panels
by eljefino
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Accords MPG on recent trip...
by gregk24
Yesterday at 07:27 PM
Built in oven-microwave combination recommendation
by Pablo
Yesterday at 07:26 PM
Newest Members
SparkSVT, grumpyoldman, jbl_91762, PapasGuy, fanie
51170 Registered Users
Who's Online
18 registered (Doug Hillary, HKPolice, bourne, FFeng7, 87sammy, 1 invisible), 614 Guests and 203 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51170 Members
64 Forums
218658 Topics
3447884 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#3257940 - 01/23/14 08:21 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
Eric Smith Offline


Registered: 02/26/05
Posts: 2590
Loc: Kansas City, KS
I tow quite a bit a FWD with no problems. Seeing that most fwd's isn't rated to tow more than 5k and that in self is a good load fine for most people. All comes down the engine/trans combo, overhang passed the rear axle etc.. no different that RWD's.

They have a long line of these things on Metcalf. Don't look half bad in person.
_________________________
05 Chevy 3500 (Class C RV) 34k (PU 5w30)
04 Escape 136k (PP 5w20)
02 Focus 121k (PP 0w20)

Top
#3258225 - 01/24/14 05:12 AM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 14554
Loc: Sunny Florida
^^^Exactly. Typical framing contractor who tows a small trailer occasionally will LOVE these vehicles, they are obviously NOT real heavy duty trucks like our 3500 RWD service vans...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3258423 - 01/24/14 09:39 AM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 4979
Loc: CT
My framers like LWB 3500's because they can fill them with [censored] and they are cheap to buy and run.

Just like the Sprinter if the price point is to high they won't get much market penetration.

Nissan is selling their vans like hot cakes to utility companies because they are under bidding GM and Ford.

Top
#3259055 - 01/24/14 08:49 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Hokiefyd]
01rangerxl Offline


Registered: 04/08/06
Posts: 7178
Loc: Birmingham, AL
More Euro Trash vans, just what we need. This one has been coming for a while though, and I think Ram Vans died in 2002 IIRC.

Soldier on Express/Savannah and full size NVs, you are the last of your kind!

It's a shame Ford is jumping on the tiny engine tin van bandwagon with the Transit. The E-Series is a seriously heavy duty vehicle built like nothing else in the "light duty" segment anymore. The big [censored] I-beams in the front suspension could eat a Euro van for lunch. It's a politically incorrect vehicle though...big, with a big engine, and lots of heavy metal throughout. It isn't a green tin van throwaway. I think these days a lot of businesses will "go green" rather than buy a van that will last 15-30 years, though I don't see how junking disposable tin vans will be green.

Interesting that when Nissan decided to get into commercial vans, they went with the tried and true enclosed pickup truck concept rather than a throwaway piece of foil.
_________________________
2002 Ford Ranger XLT
3.0 V6 / 5-Speed Automatic / 2WD
154K miles

Top
#3263112 - 01/28/14 08:10 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: DuckRyder]
Spazdog Offline


Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 5492
Loc: Arlington
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder


I thought it would be an Iveco Daily first shrug
_________________________
2005 Mazda 6S hatchback - Mobil Super 5000 5W20
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT - QSUD 5W30

Top
#3263126 - 01/28/14 08:20 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Spazdog]
DuckRyder Offline


Registered: 10/20/05
Posts: 1433
Loc: Atlanta
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Originally Posted By: DuckRyder


I thought it would be an Iveco Daily first shrug


And Iveco is a ________ company and _________ company was created by a merger of _______ and who?

Ergo Iveco Daily = Fiat Ducato shrug
_________________________
Robert
  • 1996 Acura 3.5RL
  • 2005 Honda Civic Sedan
  • 1972 Ford F100
  • 2012 Volkswagen Jetta TDi

Top
#3263170 - 01/28/14 09:12 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: DuckRyder]
Spazdog Offline


Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 5492
Loc: Arlington
Is the Iveco Daily a FWD now? I haven't seen one in years. I haven't seen an Iveco in years. It seems like Isuzu took over the bobtail import market and rebadged Mercedes Sprinters (Freightliners) are the high roof van of choice.

Last Iveco Daily I saw was a dual rear wheel passenger bus. shrug
_________________________
2005 Mazda 6S hatchback - Mobil Super 5000 5W20
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser GT - QSUD 5W30

Top
#3263216 - 01/28/14 09:44 PM Re: Ram ProMaster van [Re: Spazdog]
DuckRyder Offline


Registered: 10/20/05
Posts: 1433
Loc: Atlanta
Originally Posted By: Spazdog
Is the Iveco Daily a FWD now?...


Ah, I think you are right the Daily is rear wheel drive... it does appear to use Fiat engines and Iveco is "- A CNH INDUSTRIAL COMPANY" and CNH INDUSTRIAL COMPANY was "created from the merger of Fiat Industrial and CNH Global",

Appears the Daily slots above the Ducato in payload... shrug
_________________________
Robert
  • 1996 Acura 3.5RL
  • 2005 Honda Civic Sedan
  • 1972 Ford F100
  • 2012 Volkswagen Jetta TDi

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3