Hi. I didn't find any threads on this subject.....hBN
Preface:
I have a number of new Savage rifles in the safe. Most of them have never fired a bullet that I did not coat with hBN, (hex Boron Nitrate) and also the bore of the rifle. I have been reloading for many years and have tried all types of bullet coatings. First Moly, then Moly with wax. Next WS2 (Tungsten Disulphide, which is supposed to have the lowest coefficient of friction of anything), and lastly the hBN. I really like the hBN because it is very clean (looks like powdered sugar) the others are really messy and because of the particle size, will get in the pores of your skin, if you're not careful.... All these coatings are applied by 'impact plating'. which is super easy. The plating is only one molecule thick, because hBN won't stick to itself.
I just bought a very nice (new) McGowan SS rifle bbl. I asked them what they thought about bullet/bore coatings and they replied they didn't know anything about hBN. They stated that the bbl should be 'broken in' before using coated bullets.
I DO understand a new (especially a 'cut' bbl) will have a lot of very small burrs, etc. However, is my reasoning flawed, thinking the bore / bullet coatings will ease this? I would 'assume' the hBN would allow the bbl to get smoother much more quickly....due to much less friction.
In fact, my Oheler 35P shows a consistent 50 fps LESS with the coated bullets. Easy to get the velocity back, with a powder increase, but I'll take the reduced pressure any day.
After a range session, I wipe the bore with Kroil, dry and re-coat with hBN. I have yet to see any Cu tracks in any bbl....
BTW, all these Savage center fire rifles (with tuned triggers) will shoot near one hole groups from shot one. Yes, they do have target scopes and a good shooting bench......
I haven't found many folks that would even be willing to try (or discuss) this process.
If David Tubb uses hBN, it can't be all bad.......
Expert opinions needed!
thanks,
ron
Preface:
I have a number of new Savage rifles in the safe. Most of them have never fired a bullet that I did not coat with hBN, (hex Boron Nitrate) and also the bore of the rifle. I have been reloading for many years and have tried all types of bullet coatings. First Moly, then Moly with wax. Next WS2 (Tungsten Disulphide, which is supposed to have the lowest coefficient of friction of anything), and lastly the hBN. I really like the hBN because it is very clean (looks like powdered sugar) the others are really messy and because of the particle size, will get in the pores of your skin, if you're not careful.... All these coatings are applied by 'impact plating'. which is super easy. The plating is only one molecule thick, because hBN won't stick to itself.
I just bought a very nice (new) McGowan SS rifle bbl. I asked them what they thought about bullet/bore coatings and they replied they didn't know anything about hBN. They stated that the bbl should be 'broken in' before using coated bullets.
I DO understand a new (especially a 'cut' bbl) will have a lot of very small burrs, etc. However, is my reasoning flawed, thinking the bore / bullet coatings will ease this? I would 'assume' the hBN would allow the bbl to get smoother much more quickly....due to much less friction.
In fact, my Oheler 35P shows a consistent 50 fps LESS with the coated bullets. Easy to get the velocity back, with a powder increase, but I'll take the reduced pressure any day.
After a range session, I wipe the bore with Kroil, dry and re-coat with hBN. I have yet to see any Cu tracks in any bbl....
BTW, all these Savage center fire rifles (with tuned triggers) will shoot near one hole groups from shot one. Yes, they do have target scopes and a good shooting bench......
I haven't found many folks that would even be willing to try (or discuss) this process.
If David Tubb uses hBN, it can't be all bad.......
Expert opinions needed!
thanks,
ron