Recent Topics
European's historical usage of "thick oil"....
by Shannow
03/28/15 05:18 AM
Engine Warm-Up Discussion.
by Shannow
03/28/15 03:32 AM
Pad and rotor suggestions for 2013 accord
by BTLew81
03/27/15 11:23 PM
napa gold 7620 / Cummins 6.7
by robo339
03/27/15 11:01 PM
Tall Curb
by hotwheels
03/27/15 10:58 PM
Fram Ultra Oil Filter
by crazyoildude
03/27/15 10:35 PM
Check Engine light after replacing PCV valve?
by Hessam
03/27/15 09:58 PM
The truth regarding fungus and bacteria in diesel
by Sawtooth
03/27/15 08:43 PM
Suburban 454 Issues
by BowNisPar
03/27/15 08:40 PM
Nucleate boiling - :doh:
by Shannow
03/27/15 08:29 PM
Buick Roadmaster level ride control
by 10WSmuckers
03/27/15 08:29 PM
What is this, alkyl sulfonate, ester or mineral oi
by Pontual
03/27/15 08:16 PM
Newest Members
highlifter, MightyAl, Scout706, 02s4audi, JayDaniel
53337 Registered Users
Who's Online
33 registered (Char Baby, 1foxracing, Al, buck91, d00df00d, bobbydavro, 5 invisible), 635 Guests and 220 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
53337 Members
66 Forums
228785 Topics
3655973 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3215710 - 12/13/13 04:28 PM 2015 Chrysler 200
dishdude Offline


Registered: 11/14/08
Posts: 3846
Loc: Phoenix
It looks like the 2015 200 was spotted out in the wild - I have to say it looks pretty sharp. I've been very impressed with what Chrysler has been putting out since they broke away from Diamler and can't wait to see this car in person.



http://www.autoblog.com/2013/12/13/chryslers-200-spy-shots-uncovered/

Top
#3215717 - 12/13/13 04:32 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
SLCraig Offline


Registered: 12/21/08
Posts: 5339
Loc: London, ON, Canada
First time I've seen this...

Looks awesome.. Reminds me of an Audi (which all look great)
_________________________
2010 Civic SI sedan 6MT
F1 Syn 5w30 | PureONE | Pennzoil MTF

Top
#3215729 - 12/13/13 04:48 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
dareo Offline


Registered: 10/17/07
Posts: 470
Loc: utah
Looks good, but i don't think they can beat Honda or Mazda's 4 cylinder engines. If they sell it with a 4 at all.

Top
#3215732 - 12/13/13 04:51 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
dernp Offline


Registered: 10/18/12
Posts: 422
Loc: S/W Ontario
Looks sharp.
_________________________
2014 Honda Civic 1.8 15k HGMO 0w20
2013 Honda CR-V 2.4 AWD 36k HGMO 0w20
2012 Elantra 49k PYB 5w20
2011 Tundra 5.7L 34K TGMO



Top
#3215742 - 12/13/13 05:01 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
79sunrunner Offline


Registered: 02/26/13
Posts: 395
Loc: Illinois, USA
It looks so good. I can't wait to see the interior.
_________________________
2013 Fiat 500T PU 5/40
'79 MG Midget SunRunner 20/50 GTX (winner of TopGears Rate Your Ride)
And many more leaky British cars!

Top
#3215747 - 12/13/13 05:10 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: 79sunrunner]
Quattro Pete Offline


Registered: 10/30/02
Posts: 27596
Loc: Great Lakes
Originally Posted By: 79sunrunner
It looks so good. I can't wait to see the interior.

There are some interior shots in the link posted above. Not a big fan of what they did to the center stack. It lacks some finesse, but maybe the photos don't do it justice.
_________________________
'02 530i (PU 5W-40)
'15 Q5 3.0T
'13 F700 GS (BMW HP 15W-50)

Top
#3215754 - 12/13/13 05:26 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
jmsjags Offline


Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 564
Loc: Richmond, VA
The front looks kind of throwback. Not sure if I like it better than the current grill or not.
_________________________
Mine: 2000 Ford Focus Wagon
Hers: 2008 Ford Focus

Top
#3215755 - 12/13/13 05:26 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
Bandito440 Offline


Registered: 02/13/12
Posts: 2052
Loc: Northern NY
It'll be hard for the 200/Avenger to break out of the mediocre rental car category. At least this one looks a bit nicer.
_________________________
'13 Forester 2.5X 5MT - NAPA 0w-20 & Wix 57830
'97 R1100GS - RL 20w-50, KN-163, Shockproof Heavy

Top
#3215776 - 12/13/13 05:59 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: Bandito440]
Klutch9 Offline


Registered: 01/07/09
Posts: 1961
Loc: Rochester, MI, US, World
Looks good! Kind of a mix between an Audi and a Opel Insignia/Buick Regal.

The tail lights are also a mix between he Audi A7 and the Jaguar F-Type. None of these things are bad. The dash seems odd, kind of bland in spots.


Edited by Klutch9 (12/13/13 06:01 PM)
_________________________
'11 Fusion 2.5L - Napa 0w20
'08 Sedona LWB 3.8L - M1 0w40

Top
#3215806 - 12/13/13 06:30 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 35272
Loc: New Jersey
Looks like the rental sonata I had.

Top
#3215850 - 12/13/13 07:23 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: JHZR2]
Spazdog Offline


Registered: 09/06/10
Posts: 5878
Loc: Arlington
Originally Posted By: JHZR2
Looks like the rental sonata I had.


crackmeup

I saw a new "Cherokee" (in quotes on purpose) today. It doesn't look as bad in person as it does in print/on a monitor but from the rear all I could think was, "Where is the Santa Fe badge?" LOL
_________________________
2013 Chevrolet Cruze Eco - dealer Dexos
2014 Chrysler 200S - Whatever the dealer put in it.
1987 Honda CN250 Helix - Penn Platinum Euro5W40

Top
#3215859 - 12/13/13 07:28 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: Klutch9]
ram_man Offline


Registered: 03/15/13
Posts: 1928
Loc: southern mo
Originally Posted By: Klutch9
Looks good! Kind of a mix between an Audi and a Opel Insignia/Buick Regal.

The tail lights are also a mix between he Audi A7 and the Jaguar F-Type. None of these things are bad. The dash seems odd, kind of bland in spots.


I like the dash doesnt look to crowded. Though I think it needs some sort of trim piece going accross the passenger side something to break up the black.
_________________________
14 ford focus s 8400 miles
95 Dodge ram 1500 5.9l 183,000 miles
98 zj 4.0 226500 miles



Top
#3216433 - 12/14/13 12:25 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
FutureDoc Offline


Registered: 10/30/13
Posts: 736
Loc: North Carolina
Not "bad" but I think it is a bit... copy-catish. I would say that the Chryslers were not the best built but were at least good looking up until about 2006/2007-ish when the current design surfaced.

I might have been a bit different, but I would have loved it to be a smaller take on the 300-style. Currently it looks more like a minature version of the Impala

_________________________
'01 MR2 Spyder,57K, Havoline Syn 5w30
'99 Subaru Legacy Outback, 208K, T5/QS-Wix
'14 Subaru Outback, Havoline 0w-20 & Wix
Fleet Manager, Ph.D.

Top
#3216588 - 12/14/13 02:52 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
Miller88 Offline


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 8055
Loc: Onondaga County
Looks like a Fusion and Imapala mated.

Wonder if it's going to be better quality all around than the outgoing 200?
_________________________
'11 Focus MC 49K
'00 Cherokee PYB 125K
Ford filters on both!

Top
#3216816 - 12/14/13 08:07 PM Re: 2015 Chrysler 200 [Re: dishdude]
MrHorspwer Offline


Registered: 12/18/06
Posts: 966
Loc: Michigan
My primary concern about the new 200 isn't how it looks, it's how big it is. Chrysler is the only manufacturer that is basing their mid-size offering on a platform that has been reserved for smaller vehicles. It will be on the same platform as the Dart, which was upsized from the even smaller Giulietta.

I say this is a concern because there is another car that shrunk during it's latest refresh and it has since been quite a dud: Malibu. During the 2013 refresh, the Malibu width increased by 3 inches, but it's wheelbase shrank by 5. It was largely panned by critics, with much ire being directed toward interior space, especially in the rear seats, which is a direct result of the wheelbase reduction. A big focus of the 2014 scramble refresh was re-contouring the seats to increase rear seat legroom.

Contrast this to the Fusion, which did just the opposite of the Malibu: The 2013 refresh *increased* the wheelbase by 5 inches. An out-of-the-park sales hit, few of the press reviews have mentioned interior space as a downfall.

I know that Fiat says the Compact Wide platform will scale to mid-size, I just don't take much solace in their opinion, especially in a segment as competitive as mid-size cars. While the heavily sloped rear greenhouse looks great, it does no favors for rear occupant headroom. Couple this with their previous two challenging launches of the platform and they have an uphill battle. The Dart was launched with completely wrong powertrain options and has largely been a segment back-marker and the Cherokee has had the infamous transmission concerns. If the 200 launch is plagued by half the problems the Dart or Cherokee has had, it'll be DOA.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >