Recent Topics
Stuck ring?
by TurboFiat124
5 minutes 1 second ago
Protectant 303 vs. Wax on fiberglass surfaces
by mbacfp
Today at 03:17 PM
Jeep brakes
by buck91
Today at 03:10 PM
Any thoughts on the Hersheys attempted buyout?
by Vern_in_IL
Today at 02:55 PM
2009 Miata Race Car, M1 5w20
by 09_GXP
Today at 02:48 PM
FRAM TG3600 Cut Open
by HX520W
Today at 02:30 PM
Audi Q3 factory filter CUT OPEN
by car51
Today at 02:29 PM
MC FL910S CUT OPEN
by car51
Today at 02:04 PM
Any here storage your old License Plate
by MetalSlug
Today at 01:20 PM
Is the VCM on honda accord V6's a problem area?
by Tlhfirelion
Today at 01:09 PM
Biker gets instant revenge on car that cut him off
by John_Conrad
Today at 01:04 PM
Another W-10 saga
by Oldmoparguy1
Today at 01:02 PM
Newest Members
MNfarmer33, doublegarage, goatrancher, jameson223, graywolf001
58322 Registered Users
Who's Online
93 registered (1BADDMAX, andyd, 01rangerxl, 87sammy, 09_GXP, 13 invisible), 1930 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58322 Members
66 Forums
251046 Topics
4115113 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3195119 - 11/22/13 06:44 PM Article from 2000 about oil life monitors
y_p_w Offline


Registered: 05/06/05
Posts: 2776
Loc: SF Bay Area
I always figured there had to be an "in between". This was from the early days of oil life monitors.

Quote:
Cars Monitor Oil So You Don't Have To
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-...wners-fresh-oil

That's because most owners' manuals read as though there are two basic types of automotive maintenance: normal and severe. This has created a motoring population of under-maintainers, over-maintainers and confused car owners in between.

Under-maintainers treat their cars like appliances. You probably know at least one. They use their cars to get to work and run errands. They put gas in them, but never raise the hood to check anything. Under-maintainers believe they are "normal" drivers because they seldom drive their cars at high speeds on the highway, driving them to and from the train station or supermarket--short trips which, they believe, do not stress the vehicle. They may drive only 4,000 miles per year and consider motorists who roll up 15,000 miles a year abusive. Poor, misguided under-maintainers.

Then there are the over-maintainers, who seem to do nothing but tinker with their cars. You see them washing and waxing every weekend. They religiously change the oil and filter every 3,000 miles, as though it may bring them everlasting salvation so they can wax their cars for eternity in heaven. We confess to being a member of this flock.

But most car owners fall in between and are not sure how often to change their oil. The complexity and confusion compound when several drivers share a vehicle. One driver may use the car for numerous short trips (the "severe" type) while the other generally drives many miles at highway speeds (the "normal" type).

Should we split the difference and change the oil between 3,000 and 7,500 miles? Probably. But there is no formula to figure out the optimum oil-change interval. And what factor should we use if we add a quart of fresh oil?

So we sin on the side of waste or negligence. Fortunately for us, salvation has come in the form of the oil-life monitor.

I was under the impression that the "normal" interval could even be on the conservative side if the vehicle is being driven cross county. Don't some OLMs get to zero at well over 10K miles for this kind of driving? I know some manufacturers say change it at 10K miles max regardless of OLM, but not all.

Top
#3195126 - 11/22/13 06:54 PM Re: Article from 2000 about oil life monitors [Re: y_p_w]
bdcardinal Online   content


Registered: 06/03/05
Posts: 8827
Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
I remember in 2000 I was all concerned about getting the dial up working so I could spend 2-3 hours downloading an MP3 on Napster.
_________________________
2014 Ford Mustang GT Track Pack
1995 Ford Mustang GT

Ford/Mazda Parts Counter
NRA Benefactor Member
Opinions expressed are my own.

Top
#3195145 - 11/22/13 07:16 PM Re: Article from 2000 about oil life monitors [Re: bdcardinal]
Cristobal Offline


Registered: 01/02/11
Posts: 2307
Loc: Cal-Neva-Ari
No matter what, oil life meters today are more reliable than in the past.
_________________________
Surrounded by ferocious, snarling, & spoiled Poodles!





Top
#3195336 - 11/22/13 11:41 PM Re: Article from 2000 about oil life monitors [Re: bdcardinal]
daves87rs Offline


Registered: 02/23/09
Posts: 15635
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: bdcardinal
I remember in 2000 I was all concerned about getting the dial up working so I could spend 2-3 hours downloading an MP3 on Napster.


Lol...remember that as well...
_________________________
Whatever you are, be a good one.

Top
#3196996 - 11/24/13 07:27 PM Re: Article from 2000 about oil life monitors [Re: Cristobal]
HangFire Offline


Registered: 08/21/13
Posts: 1779
Loc: Central Maryland
Originally Posted By: Cristobal
No matter what, oil life meters today are more reliable than in the past.


If they couldn't get it right in the first place, who's to say they've gotten it right now?
_________________________
Various musings: http://hangfire.net

Top