Recent Topics
185 MPH at Bathurst this year ?
by Shannow
Today at 06:13 AM
FK massimo crdi 10w40
by nyumski
Today at 05:45 AM
F1 - 2015 British Grand Prix
by gofast182
Today at 05:20 AM
Tiptronic hard shift
by Najarro
Today at 01:08 AM
Inherited a 1996 Nissan Maxima - Thoughts?
by 92saturnsl2
Today at 12:34 AM
USA vs Japan in Women World Cup
by HTSS_TR
Today at 12:12 AM
Best radiator flush?
by Avery4
Today at 12:04 AM
Purflux LS218 [Cut Open]
by Darwin1138
Yesterday at 11:54 PM
royal purple question
by Festiva_Man
Yesterday at 09:43 PM
Paul Pantone
by CourierDriver
Yesterday at 09:12 PM
Question about tires pressure for cars that rarely
by MetalSlug
Yesterday at 09:10 PM
Wher would I get an generic oil filter pipe?
by Pontual
Yesterday at 08:50 PM
Newest Members
TimBerty, Najarro, 96Suburban, B20z, tqmshirt
54550 Registered Users
Who's Online
76 registered (AutoCoil, ARB1977, B20z, anl0109, bfong, 1942, 3 invisible), 1187 Guests and 101 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54550 Members
66 Forums
233709 Topics
3753698 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3195119 - 11/22/13 06:44 PM Article from 2000 about oil life monitors
y_p_w Offline


Registered: 05/06/05
Posts: 2725
Loc: SF Bay Area
I always figured there had to be an "in between". This was from the early days of oil life monitors.

Quote:
Cars Monitor Oil So You Don't Have To
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-...wners-fresh-oil

That's because most owners' manuals read as though there are two basic types of automotive maintenance: normal and severe. This has created a motoring population of under-maintainers, over-maintainers and confused car owners in between.

Under-maintainers treat their cars like appliances. You probably know at least one. They use their cars to get to work and run errands. They put gas in them, but never raise the hood to check anything. Under-maintainers believe they are "normal" drivers because they seldom drive their cars at high speeds on the highway, driving them to and from the train station or supermarket--short trips which, they believe, do not stress the vehicle. They may drive only 4,000 miles per year and consider motorists who roll up 15,000 miles a year abusive. Poor, misguided under-maintainers.

Then there are the over-maintainers, who seem to do nothing but tinker with their cars. You see them washing and waxing every weekend. They religiously change the oil and filter every 3,000 miles, as though it may bring them everlasting salvation so they can wax their cars for eternity in heaven. We confess to being a member of this flock.

But most car owners fall in between and are not sure how often to change their oil. The complexity and confusion compound when several drivers share a vehicle. One driver may use the car for numerous short trips (the "severe" type) while the other generally drives many miles at highway speeds (the "normal" type).

Should we split the difference and change the oil between 3,000 and 7,500 miles? Probably. But there is no formula to figure out the optimum oil-change interval. And what factor should we use if we add a quart of fresh oil?

So we sin on the side of waste or negligence. Fortunately for us, salvation has come in the form of the oil-life monitor.

I was under the impression that the "normal" interval could even be on the conservative side if the vehicle is being driven cross county. Don't some OLMs get to zero at well over 10K miles for this kind of driving? I know some manufacturers say change it at 10K miles max regardless of OLM, but not all.

Top
#3195126 - 11/22/13 06:54 PM Re: Article from 2000 about oil life monitors [Re: y_p_w]
bdcardinal Offline


Registered: 06/03/05
Posts: 7374
Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
I remember in 2000 I was all concerned about getting the dial up working so I could spend 2-3 hours downloading an MP3 on Napster.
_________________________
2014 Ford Mustang GT Track Pack
1995 Ford Mustang GT

Ford/Mazda Parts Counter

Opinions expressed are my own.

Top
#3195145 - 11/22/13 07:16 PM Re: Article from 2000 about oil life monitors [Re: bdcardinal]
Cristobal Offline


Registered: 01/02/11
Posts: 2216
Loc: Cal-Neva-Ari
No matter what, oil life meters today are more reliable than in the past.
_________________________
Surrounded by ferocious & spoiled Poodles!





Top
#3195336 - 11/22/13 11:41 PM Re: Article from 2000 about oil life monitors [Re: bdcardinal]
daves87rs Offline


Registered: 02/23/09
Posts: 14478
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: bdcardinal
I remember in 2000 I was all concerned about getting the dial up working so I could spend 2-3 hours downloading an MP3 on Napster.


Lol...remember that as well...
_________________________
“The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing.”

Top
#3196996 - 11/24/13 07:27 PM Re: Article from 2000 about oil life monitors [Re: Cristobal]
HangFire Offline


Registered: 08/21/13
Posts: 1338
Loc: Central Maryland
Originally Posted By: Cristobal
No matter what, oil life meters today are more reliable than in the past.


If they couldn't get it right in the first place, who's to say they've gotten it right now?
_________________________
Various musings: http://hangfire.net

Top