Recent Topics
Crude Oil at Historic Lows and 5W30 is High Priced
by cjcride
2 minutes 39 seconds ago
2014 f150 coolant
by robo339
10 minutes 54 seconds ago
Filter Mania
by BlueOvalFitter
29 minutes 2 seconds ago
Fram tough guard Q
by gabriel9766
38 minutes 14 seconds ago
FWD vs AWD. Is it worth it?
by powayroger
Today at 06:12 PM
Thoughts on these SUV?
by powayroger
Today at 06:08 PM
Selling a vehicle to someone out of state?
by Reddy45
Today at 05:43 PM
Experience at Havoline Xpress Lube
by GMFan
Today at 05:40 PM
January sets another record for background checks
by Doog
Today at 05:40 PM
Wiha screwdrivers
by Donald
Today at 05:05 PM
How Can I Print 755 Mailing Labels For Post Cards?
by crazyoildude
Today at 04:17 PM
Valvoline Full Synthetic High Mileage and Blend HM
by mctmatt
Today at 03:59 PM
Newest Members
ukpdxwrx, TerrenceRocks, stevewarren, Dimarv, jscheier
56862 Registered Users
Who's Online
108 registered (Al, AlaskaMike, A1O, 2015_PSD, 01rangerxl, 12 invisible), 1601 Guests and 230 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
56862 Members
66 Forums
244421 Topics
3980206 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3124336 - 09/14/13 04:49 AM GM tops in torque~
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 17163
Loc: Sunny Florida
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/09/1...intcmp=features

Loving those new DI V8's. Can't wait to see how they run in the real world.
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3124342 - 09/14/13 05:25 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
Silverado12 Offline


Registered: 02/26/13
Posts: 1716
Loc: Central Virginia
Put that motor in a regular cab, 2WD 1500 and have some fun.
_________________________
12 Chevy Silverado ext. cab LS, 2WD 4.3 auto
15 Chevy Cruze 1LT auto
07 Harley Dyna Street Bob 96 c.i. 6 sp.
99 Jeep XJ
Buy American.

Top
#3124404 - 09/14/13 07:12 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
hattaresguy Online   content


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 7138
Loc: CT
To bad its only going in the $60k trucks.

That would be a fun motor to have in a lighter truck, or if they made another SS...


Edited by hattaresguy (09/14/13 07:13 AM)

Top
#3124412 - 09/14/13 07:21 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
Zaedock Offline


Registered: 09/10/05
Posts: 3860
Loc: Massachusetts
Perhaps the 6.2L does - for now. The Ford 6.2L has plenty of room for improvement.

The new DI 5.3L GM motor still makes less HP and only 3 ft lbs more Torque than my 5.0L Ford, yet has more displacement. I'm not impressed.

BTW - I tow a LOT and if you pull 11,000+ lbs with a half ton, you're a fool. These "towing wars" with ALL the auto makers are nothing but silly to me.
_________________________
2012 F150 Ex-cab 5.0L/2004 Malibu Maxx LT
1992 YJ "The Heep"/1994 Olds Cutlass Ciera 3.1/auto
1975 Ford Bronco/1959 Willys CJ5/20XX Custom rock crawler

Top
#3124418 - 09/14/13 07:33 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
itguy08 Online   content


Registered: 09/15/11
Posts: 2248
Loc: Central PA
A quick tweak to the Ecoboost and it will top GM. My guess is they will up power for 2015's redesign. The 5.0 has LOTS of headroom as does the 6.2.

In the 1500 space, Ram is the one sorely feeling the heat. Lowest payload, lowest tow ratings, and average fuel economy.

Top
#3124422 - 09/14/13 07:42 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: Zaedock]
95busa Offline


Registered: 10/15/05
Posts: 1249
Loc: Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
Perhaps the 6.2L does - for now. The Ford 6.2L has plenty of room for improvement.

The new DI 5.3L GM motor still makes less HP and only 3 ft lbs more Torque than my 5.0L Ford, yet has more displacement. I'm not impressed.

BTW - I tow a LOT and if you pull 11,000+ lbs with a half ton, you're a fool. These "towing wars" with ALL the auto makers are nothing but silly to me.

Amen
_________________________
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty 4x4
2009 Dodge Grand Caravan
2014 Kia Forte KOUP- totaled by a drunk driver

Top
#3124475 - 09/14/13 08:26 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: itguy08]
Miller88 Online   content


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 10178
Loc: Onondaga County
I read in a few places that stock, the ecoboast is good for 500/500 ... the problem was that it was blowing up AWD components in the SHO and had to be detuned. I'm sure it would be pretty easy for Ford to up the power a bit more with some software tweaks




Originally Posted By: itguy08
A quick tweak to the Ecoboost and it will top GM. My guess is they will up power for 2015's redesign. The 5.0 has LOTS of headroom as does the 6.2.

In the 1500 space, Ram is the one sorely feeling the heat. Lowest payload, lowest tow ratings, and average fuel economy.


The first two was intentional ... they purposely went with coil springs ...
_________________________
I run the 10w30 becuase 0w20 makes my CVT shift funny

Top
#3124850 - 09/14/13 05:48 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: Zaedock]
jimmy87 Offline


Registered: 04/08/12
Posts: 204
Loc: texas
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
Perhaps the 6.2L does - for now. The Ford 6.2L has plenty of room for improvement.

The new DI 5.3L GM motor still makes less HP and only 3 ft lbs more Torque than my 5.0L Ford, yet has more displacement. I'm not impressed.

BTW - I tow a LOT and if you pull 11,000+ lbs with a half ton, you're a fool. These "towing wars" with ALL the auto makers are nothing but silly to me.


Less hp? Only 3 more ft lbs of torque? True, but at what rpm's? Oh and since we are talking about what's been put on paper lets not forget that the GM engine with more "displacement" gets better fuel economy then the 5.0. Direct injection or not the 5.3 is STILL a push rod engine, and of course the 5.0 has DOHC…
_________________________
2013 GMC SIERRA 5.3L
2002 Toyota highlander 2.4L

Top
#3124859 - 09/14/13 05:53 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: jimmy87]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 30799
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: jimmy87
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
Perhaps the 6.2L does - for now. The Ford 6.2L has plenty of room for improvement.

The new DI 5.3L GM motor still makes less HP and only 3 ft lbs more Torque than my 5.0L Ford, yet has more displacement. I'm not impressed.

BTW - I tow a LOT and if you pull 11,000+ lbs with a half ton, you're a fool. These "towing wars" with ALL the auto makers are nothing but silly to me.


Less hp? Only 3 more ft lbs of torque? True, but at what rpm's? Oh and since we are talking about what's been put on paper lets not forget that the GM engine with more "displacement" gets better fuel economy then the 5.0. Direct injection or not the 5.3 is STILL a push rod engine, and of course the 5.0 has DOHC…


Isn't the F-150 heavier?

I can see the 5.0L making 500HP with DI. Considering it made 444HP in non-DI BOSS 302 trim.

I don't think anybody is knocking the LSx engines, they are a formidable force. But once shouldn't underestimate their competition either. The current generation of Ford's OHC engines have proven to not only be extremely durable but potent performers as well.

All of the current trucks have awesome engine line-ups IMHO.
_________________________
02 Expedition
06 Charger R/T
14 Charger SRT-8

Top
#3124863 - 09/14/13 05:57 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
Clevy Offline


Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 9777
Loc: Saskatoon canada
Simple tuning and the ford 5.0 will easily beat those numbers but low rpm grunt is what a truck needs and a dohc engine tends to need rpm for power.
Dodge can likely get more hp from the hemi,and mds helps fuel economy.
I look forward to seeing what happens next
_________________________
2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter

Top
#3124870 - 09/14/13 06:05 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
supton Offline


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 7385
Loc: NH
I dunno. Used to be common to derate motors in trucks. Cars generally don't do heavy loads for long periods of time. Lots of heat gets generated. Has that changed today? As in, vastly better control over hot spots in the engine, and keeping uniform temps, oil issues and whatnot?
_________________________
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 6spd manual, 107k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra double cab, 4.6L, auto, 114k, his

Top
#3124873 - 09/14/13 06:11 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: Clevy]
jimmy87 Offline


Registered: 04/08/12
Posts: 204
Loc: texas
Originally Posted By: Clevy
Simple tuning and the ford 5.0 will easily beat those numbers but low rpm grunt is what a truck needs and a dohc engine tends to need rpm for power.
Dodge can likely get more hp from the hemi,and mds helps fuel economy.
I look forward to seeing what happens next


Very true!

"low rpm grunt is what a truck needs",

A. K. A:

LOW END TORQUE!



Edited by jimmy87 (09/14/13 06:13 PM)
_________________________
2013 GMC SIERRA 5.3L
2002 Toyota highlander 2.4L

Top
#3124878 - 09/14/13 06:20 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: jimmy87]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 30799
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: jimmy87
Originally Posted By: Clevy
Simple tuning and the ford 5.0 will easily beat those numbers but low rpm grunt is what a truck needs and a dohc engine tends to need rpm for power.
Dodge can likely get more hp from the hemi,and mds helps fuel economy.
I look forward to seeing what happens next


Very true!

"low rpm grunt is what a truck needs",

A. K. A:

LOW END TORQUE!



Which is where the variable cam timing on a DOHC motor can shine if done right. My M5 makes prodigious torque right off idle and its torque curve looks like Saskatchewan. But it doesn't make peak HP until 6,800RPM.

Ford would be able to work similar magic with their 5.0L.
_________________________
02 Expedition
06 Charger R/T
14 Charger SRT-8

Top
#3124880 - 09/14/13 06:24 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: OVERKILL]
Duffman77 Offline


Registered: 12/21/06
Posts: 561
Loc: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
and its torque curve looks like Saskatchewan.


Great comment but there is maybe only 10 guys on this site that can appreciate it.

Top
#3124898 - 09/14/13 06:53 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
wirelessF Offline


Registered: 10/04/07
Posts: 1577
Loc: Oahu, Hawaii
Can't wait for these Gen V's to be in aftermarket applications.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >