Recent Topics
Generator Questions / Comments
by Vikas
07/29/14 07:23 AM
Why do some brands only publish tq and not hp?
by LoneRanger
07/29/14 06:49 AM
Replaced Opti-Coat with CQuartz UK - Holy Gloss!
by The Critic
07/29/14 02:59 AM
At 65
by OneEyeJack
07/29/14 01:25 AM
roofing felt
by bmwjohn
07/29/14 12:09 AM
Pennzoil Ultra 10w30 1,704 on PU 1997 Camry 194k
by Nick1994
07/29/14 12:04 AM
MaxLife 5w30, 5k oil on 07 Sienna with 95k
by raitchison
07/28/14 10:50 PM
big car crash
by morris
07/28/14 10:12 PM
U.S. says Russia violated nuclear missile treaty.
by dave1251
07/28/14 09:58 PM
Rotella in a civic MT
by gametom
07/28/14 09:51 PM
14' JGC with the pentastar 3.6L
by subaroo
07/28/14 09:41 PM
Your wax/sealant lasted how many months?!?!
by The Critic
07/28/14 09:16 PM
Newest Members
dink28m7, Titus12, JayBirdy, Michael_Trinh, kensley
50789 Registered Users
Who's Online
83 registered (2009Edge, 97f150, 2010_FX4, 05LGTLtd, 05lgt, 94astro, 9 invisible), 1404 Guests and 222 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
50789 Members
64 Forums
216977 Topics
3415951 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3124336 - 09/14/13 04:49 AM GM tops in torque~
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 14261
Loc: Sunny Florida
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/09/1...intcmp=features

Loving those new DI V8's. Can't wait to see how they run in the real world.
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3124342 - 09/14/13 05:25 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
Silverado12 Online   content


Registered: 02/26/13
Posts: 652
Loc: Central Virginia
Put that motor in a regular cab, 2WD 1500 and have some fun.
_________________________
2012 Chevy Silverado ext. cab LS, 2WD 4.3 auto
2010 Dodge Challenger SE 3.5 V-6
2007 Harley Dyna Street Bob 96 c.i. 6 speed

Top
#3124404 - 09/14/13 07:12 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
hattaresguy Offline


Registered: 06/01/11
Posts: 4864
Loc: CT
To bad its only going in the $60k trucks.

That would be a fun motor to have in a lighter truck, or if they made another SS...


Edited by hattaresguy (09/14/13 07:13 AM)

Top
#3124412 - 09/14/13 07:21 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
Zaedock Offline


Registered: 09/10/05
Posts: 3756
Loc: Massachusetts
Perhaps the 6.2L does - for now. The Ford 6.2L has plenty of room for improvement.

The new DI 5.3L GM motor still makes less HP and only 3 ft lbs more Torque than my 5.0L Ford, yet has more displacement. I'm not impressed.

BTW - I tow a LOT and if you pull 11,000+ lbs with a half ton, you're a fool. These "towing wars" with ALL the auto makers are nothing but silly to me.
_________________________
2012 F150 Ex-cab 5.0L/2004 Malibu Maxx LT
1992 YJ "The Heep"/1994 Olds Cutlass Ciera 3.1/auto
1975 Ford Bronco/1959 Willys CJ5/20XX Custom rock crawler

Top
#3124418 - 09/14/13 07:33 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
itguy08 Offline


Registered: 09/15/11
Posts: 1399
Loc: Central PA
A quick tweak to the Ecoboost and it will top GM. My guess is they will up power for 2015's redesign. The 5.0 has LOTS of headroom as does the 6.2.

In the 1500 space, Ram is the one sorely feeling the heat. Lowest payload, lowest tow ratings, and average fuel economy.
_________________________
Mine:
2010 Taurus SHO, 77k, dealer oil and filter
2011 F150 SuperCrew, 49k, Penzoil Platinum, Motorcraft filter

Hers:
2003 Escape, 145k, QS Defy

Top
#3124422 - 09/14/13 07:42 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: Zaedock]
95busa Offline


Registered: 10/15/05
Posts: 1045
Loc: Virginia
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
Perhaps the 6.2L does - for now. The Ford 6.2L has plenty of room for improvement.

The new DI 5.3L GM motor still makes less HP and only 3 ft lbs more Torque than my 5.0L Ford, yet has more displacement. I'm not impressed.

BTW - I tow a LOT and if you pull 11,000+ lbs with a half ton, you're a fool. These "towing wars" with ALL the auto makers are nothing but silly to me.

Amen
_________________________
2005 Ford F250 Super Duty 4x4
2011 Ford E350 Super Duty
2006 Chrysler Pacifica Touring

Top
#3124475 - 09/14/13 08:26 AM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: itguy08]
Miller88 Online   content


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 6074
Loc: Onondaga County
I read in a few places that stock, the ecoboast is good for 500/500 ... the problem was that it was blowing up AWD components in the SHO and had to be detuned. I'm sure it would be pretty easy for Ford to up the power a bit more with some software tweaks




Originally Posted By: itguy08
A quick tweak to the Ecoboost and it will top GM. My guess is they will up power for 2015's redesign. The 5.0 has LOTS of headroom as does the 6.2.

In the 1500 space, Ram is the one sorely feeling the heat. Lowest payload, lowest tow ratings, and average fuel economy.


The first two was intentional ... they purposely went with coil springs ...
_________________________
'11 Focus PYB 45K
'00 Cherokee PYB 125K

Top
#3124850 - 09/14/13 05:48 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: Zaedock]
jimmy87 Offline


Registered: 04/08/12
Posts: 194
Loc: texas
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
Perhaps the 6.2L does - for now. The Ford 6.2L has plenty of room for improvement.

The new DI 5.3L GM motor still makes less HP and only 3 ft lbs more Torque than my 5.0L Ford, yet has more displacement. I'm not impressed.

BTW - I tow a LOT and if you pull 11,000+ lbs with a half ton, you're a fool. These "towing wars" with ALL the auto makers are nothing but silly to me.


Less hp? Only 3 more ft lbs of torque? True, but at what rpm's? Oh and since we are talking about what's been put on paper lets not forget that the GM engine with more "displacement" gets better fuel economy then the 5.0. Direct injection or not the 5.3 is STILL a push rod engine, and of course the 5.0 has DOHC…
_________________________
2013 GMC SIERRA 5.3L
2002 Toyota highlander 2.4L

Top
#3124859 - 09/14/13 05:53 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: jimmy87]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 25660
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: jimmy87
Originally Posted By: Zaedock
Perhaps the 6.2L does - for now. The Ford 6.2L has plenty of room for improvement.

The new DI 5.3L GM motor still makes less HP and only 3 ft lbs more Torque than my 5.0L Ford, yet has more displacement. I'm not impressed.

BTW - I tow a LOT and if you pull 11,000+ lbs with a half ton, you're a fool. These "towing wars" with ALL the auto makers are nothing but silly to me.


Less hp? Only 3 more ft lbs of torque? True, but at what rpm's? Oh and since we are talking about what's been put on paper lets not forget that the GM engine with more "displacement" gets better fuel economy then the 5.0. Direct injection or not the 5.3 is STILL a push rod engine, and of course the 5.0 has DOHC…


Isn't the F-150 heavier?

I can see the 5.0L making 500HP with DI. Considering it made 444HP in non-DI BOSS 302 trim.

I don't think anybody is knocking the LSx engines, they are a formidable force. But once shouldn't underestimate their competition either. The current generation of Ford's OHC engines have proven to not only be extremely durable but potent performers as well.

All of the current trucks have awesome engine line-ups IMHO.
_________________________
Network Engineer
02 Expedition
01 BMW ///M5
05 Forester XT

Top
#3124863 - 09/14/13 05:57 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
Clevy Offline


Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 6995
Loc: Saskatoon canada
Simple tuning and the ford 5.0 will easily beat those numbers but low rpm grunt is what a truck needs and a dohc engine tends to need rpm for power.
Dodge can likely get more hp from the hemi,and mds helps fuel economy.
I look forward to seeing what happens next
_________________________
2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter

Top
#3124870 - 09/14/13 06:05 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
supton Offline


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 4267
Loc: NH
I dunno. Used to be common to derate motors in trucks. Cars generally don't do heavy loads for long periods of time. Lots of heat gets generated. Has that changed today? As in, vastly better control over hot spots in the engine, and keeping uniform temps, oil issues and whatnot?
_________________________
2004 VW Jetta Wagon, TDI, 5spd manual, 296kmile, his
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 6spd manual, 74k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra double cab, 4.6L, auto, 87k

Top
#3124873 - 09/14/13 06:11 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: Clevy]
jimmy87 Offline


Registered: 04/08/12
Posts: 194
Loc: texas
Originally Posted By: Clevy
Simple tuning and the ford 5.0 will easily beat those numbers but low rpm grunt is what a truck needs and a dohc engine tends to need rpm for power.
Dodge can likely get more hp from the hemi,and mds helps fuel economy.
I look forward to seeing what happens next


Very true!

"low rpm grunt is what a truck needs",

A. K. A:

LOW END TORQUE!



Edited by jimmy87 (09/14/13 06:13 PM)
_________________________
2013 GMC SIERRA 5.3L
2002 Toyota highlander 2.4L

Top
#3124878 - 09/14/13 06:20 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: jimmy87]
OVERKILL Offline


Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 25660
Loc: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: jimmy87
Originally Posted By: Clevy
Simple tuning and the ford 5.0 will easily beat those numbers but low rpm grunt is what a truck needs and a dohc engine tends to need rpm for power.
Dodge can likely get more hp from the hemi,and mds helps fuel economy.
I look forward to seeing what happens next


Very true!

"low rpm grunt is what a truck needs",

A. K. A:

LOW END TORQUE!



Which is where the variable cam timing on a DOHC motor can shine if done right. My M5 makes prodigious torque right off idle and its torque curve looks like Saskatchewan. But it doesn't make peak HP until 6,800RPM.

Ford would be able to work similar magic with their 5.0L.
_________________________
Network Engineer
02 Expedition
01 BMW ///M5
05 Forester XT

Top
#3124880 - 09/14/13 06:24 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: OVERKILL]
Duffman77 Offline


Registered: 12/21/06
Posts: 561
Loc: Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
and its torque curve looks like Saskatchewan.


Great comment but there is maybe only 10 guys on this site that can appreciate it.

Top
#3124898 - 09/14/13 06:53 PM Re: GM tops in torque~ [Re: SteveSRT8]
wirelessF Offline


Registered: 10/04/07
Posts: 1220
Loc: Oahu, Hawaii
Can't wait for these Gen V's to be in aftermarket applications.
_________________________
For racing or off-road use only!

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >