Recent Topics
8/1-8/31 NAPA Dollar Days
by tenderloin
08/01/14 01:52 AM
PP 0w-20 7,400 mi. 2013 Subaru Forester FB25
by Bandito440
08/01/14 12:57 AM
Laboratory Analysis of MMO
by MolaKule
07/31/14 11:22 PM
Old hang on window a/c maintenance......
by daves66nova
07/31/14 11:12 PM
best flashlight batteries?
by Chris142
07/31/14 10:54 PM
Possible sludged VQ37HR
by aualtima3.5
07/31/14 10:41 PM
"Gravel Traps"
by simplistic
07/31/14 10:23 PM
Transmission clunk, I cannot figure it out!
by Klutch9
07/31/14 09:56 PM
The 15,000 Mile OCI
by macarose
07/31/14 09:40 PM
Coolant and head gasket question
by Patrick0525
07/31/14 09:12 PM
Bleeding brakes
by wallyuwl
07/31/14 09:05 PM
Poles #EatApples to annoy Putin
by dave1251
07/31/14 08:57 PM
Newest Members
jdfay, kaesees, bprat318, Winter_Texan, SloopJohnB
50816 Registered Users
Who's Online
28 registered (Clubber_Lang, chestand, calzone, b1amgm47, CaspianM, 3 invisible), 654 Guests and 233 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
50816 Members
64 Forums
217139 Topics
3419148 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#3112734 - 09/02/13 03:21 PM Fram HM3600 cut open
MrQuackers Online   content


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 923
Loc: Oregon
OCI was only 2126 miles. The goop appears to have dissolved over that period. The oil was changed over a month ago and the filter has been base side down all that time. The amount of oil gushing out of the filter after cutting tells me Fram knows how to make a filter that holds oil. Kudos Jay.




_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Let freedom ring GGOK


Top
#3112741 - 09/02/13 03:30 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
gregk24 Offline


Registered: 04/13/13
Posts: 2560
Loc: FL, USA
Looks a little wavy...a decent filter for a short OCI.
_________________________
2006 Honda Accord LX 2.4 i-vtec 122K
Honda Genuine Synthetic Blend 0w20 Fram Ultra

2005 Chevy Uplander 3.5 114K
Castrol Edge FST EP 10w30 Fram Ultra

Top
#3112742 - 09/02/13 03:30 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 4458
Loc: Mahzurrah!
The 3600's and 3980's are my preferred orange cans, although this one seems a little light on media on the seam side. Held up fine though, nothing out of line.

As always, thanks for cutting and posting!
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0 @ 121k Pennzoil HM 10w30
Napa Silver 31515
KIA Sedona 37k, Chevy Lumina 169k, Chrysler Sebring 170k, Ford Ranger 174k!

Top
#3112745 - 09/02/13 03:33 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
MrQuackers Online   content


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 923
Loc: Oregon
Well, although I am happy with this filter I liquidated them and stocked up on Motorcraft FL-400S filters. I may get a few TG3600 filters if I find a sale though. Fram really has a good system for retaining oil over extended periods.
_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Let freedom ring GGOK


Top
#3112746 - 09/02/13 03:34 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
ZeeOSix Offline


Registered: 07/22/10
Posts: 6769
Loc: PNW
Oil looks pretty dirty for 2100 miles.

Top
#3112747 - 09/02/13 03:36 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
MrQuackers Online   content


Registered: 08/17/12
Posts: 923
Loc: Oregon
I bought the vehicle @ 16 years old ('93 SL2) with only 62k on the odometer. It was a short tripper so I guess I will be cleaning out this engine forever I suppose. It does run tip top though @ 98k


Edited by MrQuackers (09/02/13 03:42 PM)
Edit Reason: sp
_________________________
The more you know, the less you don't know. YMMV!!!
coffee

Let freedom ring GGOK


Top
#3112748 - 09/02/13 03:39 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: KCJeep]
HTSS_TR Offline


Registered: 04/17/06
Posts: 12900
Loc: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted By: KCJeep
The 3600's and 3980's are my preferred orange cans, although this one seems a little light on media on the seam side. Held up fine though, nothing out of line.

As always, thanks for cutting and posting!

Fram Extra Guard and HM are a little lite on filter media. Fram Tough Guard and Ultra have more media, similar to competitors.

The main weakness of Fram Extra Guard is it has less media(and not very efficient) as Purolator, while it costs more.
_________________________
'94 LS400
'00 E430
'04 S2000
"Consumerism has accustomed us to waste. But throwing food away is like stealing it from the poor and hungry" Pop Francis

Top
#3112772 - 09/02/13 04:13 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
spasm3 Offline


Registered: 05/30/10
Posts: 3435
Loc: north carolina
I would be curious about the composition of the goo, can't be too time released if its gone in 2100 miles.
_________________________
Bryan
13 elantra 27k penplat5w30
03 chevy avalanche63k m1 0-30
02 saturnsc1 55k pennultra
01 saturnsc1 160k nextgenhm
93 olds ciera 63k 5w30 nexgenhm
gz250

Top
#3112791 - 09/02/13 04:39 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
ChevyBadger Offline


Registered: 01/14/13
Posts: 509
Loc: Wisconsin
I have used Tough Guards and they've done really well for me and I will probably use them again. The Ultras look pretty awesome also. I won't however use these HM ones with that goop in them. No way will I trust something that they won't even say what it is.


Edited by ChevyBadger (09/02/13 04:39 PM)
_________________________
08 Chevy Silverado 5 qts VWB & 1 qt of Napa synthetic Napa Pro Select filter
04 Chevy Impala VWB 5w30 Mann filter

Top
#3112820 - 09/02/13 05:25 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: ChevyBadger]
ZeeOSix Offline


Registered: 07/22/10
Posts: 6769
Loc: PNW
Originally Posted By: ChevyBadger
I won't however use these HM ones with that goop in them. No way will I trust something that they won't even say what it is.


It's "engineered goo" ... just like "engineered fiber". grin

Top
#3112860 - 09/02/13 06:07 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
sayjac Offline


Registered: 10/13/08
Posts: 7912
Loc: The Old North State
For a $1.25-$1.50 as a closeout special some posters got in on, one thing. For ~$6.50 everyday Wally price, not so much.

Goo basket, proprietary oil conditioner designed to reduce TAN and extend oil life.

Agree it looks fairly dirty for ~2100 mi., but filter looks ok. Still not keen on seeing centertube top with bypass removed, but most say no biggie so I'll leave it there.

Thanks for the pics.

Top
#3112948 - 09/02/13 07:29 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
David1 Offline


Registered: 06/17/13
Posts: 820
Loc: USA, FLA
Some people say that FRAM EXTRA GUARD or the HIGH MILEAGE Filter don't have enough pleats..
However if you go to the FRAM site, it claims it does not need as many pleats as other filters b/c the material is made out of is HIGH QUALITY then the others.


I use Honda OEM and they are basically FRAM Tough Guard without the screen on the bypass valve...

Who knows I might actually try a FRAM Tough Guard or even a FRAM ULTRA, but I will use the 7317,, not the 3593a

The 7317 looks exactly like a HONDA OEM, same size and shape and even the holes.

However.... looks like that filter did it s Job.

I have opened up a NAPA SILVER oil filter one time and the filter wasn't even dirty after its 4000 miles...

However each time i open a HONDA OEM Filter I can see DIRT in it.

Things that make you say HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM




Edited by David1 (09/02/13 07:30 PM)
_________________________
2002 Honda Accord V6 3.0 Automatic Trans 183000 Miles
Valvoline Maxx Life 5W30
FRAM ULTRA OR FRAM TOUGH GUARD Or HONDA Filtech A01s

Top
#3113084 - 09/02/13 09:33 PM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: MrQuackers]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 4458
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Jay from Fram that posts on here once in a while has made mention of the same, that competitors entry level filters use more media because it is lower quality and therefore they need more of it to achieve the same result.

I have no idea how on earth we would substantiate that but it's an interesting come back to a common criticism of the orange can.

My earlier comment was in regard to Fram itself, the pictured filter seemed to have a low number of pleats for a Fram 3600. I'd expect about 37-39 this one looked shy of that.
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4.0 @ 121k Pennzoil HM 10w30
Napa Silver 31515
KIA Sedona 37k, Chevy Lumina 169k, Chrysler Sebring 170k, Ford Ranger 174k!

Top
#3113257 - 09/03/13 06:43 AM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: David1]
sayjac Offline


Registered: 10/13/08
Posts: 7912
Loc: The Old North State
Quote:
..I use Honda OEM and they are basically FRAM Tough Guard without the screen on the bypass valve...

If by basically you mean, the A-02 is made by Fram, has fiber end caps and a silicone adbv, then yes.

However once you get past that, based on the specs of each filter, the similarities end. The TG is rated 99%>20um, otoh the A-02 tested at ~66%@20um, a huge difference. The medias, the critical component, are obviously very different. And the TG hasn't used the screen over bypass for some time now.

What one may see with the naked eye for dirt in a filter dissection, never invalidates ISO test spec results/rating.

Top
#3113320 - 09/03/13 08:20 AM Re: Fram HM3600 cut open [Re: David1]
Jim Allen Offline


Registered: 08/12/05
Posts: 4477
Loc: NW Ohio
Originally Posted By: David1

However if you go to the FRAM site, it claims it does not need as many pleats as other filters b/c the material is made out of is HIGH QUALITY then the others.


That's a claim I can't agree with... at least on the surface. When you are talking about cellulose, it's a surface loaded media. None of them are very thick and they carry most of the contamination on the surface. While there may be differences in capacity per square inch of media between one cellulose media and another (even given more or less equal efficiency), surface loaded media is going to be largely the same... per square inch of media ( I said largely, there are exceptions to the rule). While efficiency is a product of the density and pore sizes of the cellulose media, capacity is all about how many square inches of that media are in the can. You could conceivably have a high efficiency cellulose media in a filter but if you chintz out on the amount you get a high efficiency filter with a short life (a 3-5K filter). And low flow all the way thru that life (versus a filter with lots more of the same or similar media).

So, yes, the amount of media is an important factor. I think most of us know that. One common perceptive mistake I see here is when people forget to factor in the media type during visual comparisons. That mistake appears mostly when visually comparing cellulose and synthetic fiber. A cellulose media needs lots more media to achieve the same capacity and flow as synthetic fiber but we see some comments here when a syn filter is dissected, such as, "Oh look how few pleats it has.. it must not flow very well." Not true, of course, in this apples to oranges comparison. The syn media is thicker and caries a lot of contamination inside that thicker media. It may actually have (many do) variable (graduated) efficiency, where the outer part catches mostly the bigger stuff and the inner part catches the smaller.

So bottom line, if the media is of a similar type and efficiency, then comparisons on media area are valid and more of any type is better for flow and capacity.
_________________________
Jim Allen
Keepin' the Good Old Days of Four Wheeling Alive

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >