Originally Posted By: dailydriver
True, and agreed on the 'winding it out to a red line scream' can be fun, and an aural thrill.
BUT, that same HP/L 'power density', which FORCES one to 'scream it out' to a 9K+ red line in order to make said power also causes the oft mentioned and touted as a 'benefit' (usually by the import/Nippon ONLY crews) and advantage over larger displacement, and/or pushrod engines (which do NOT have to be wound to the stratosphere) fuel mileage claim to fame to take a SERIOUS hit.
Thus negating that claimed 'advantage' (the higher one revs, the more fuel is needed, almost exponentially).
True. The combined freeway and city mpg of the OHV 2200 Cavalier and B16A2 Civic Si are virtually the same.
But the Civic is a riot at 8000 rpm. The Cavalier is no fun. It does enjoy about a 30ft-lb torque advantage for its extra 600cc. It is easier to drive from a standing start, but it is no fun.
True, and agreed on the 'winding it out to a red line scream' can be fun, and an aural thrill.
BUT, that same HP/L 'power density', which FORCES one to 'scream it out' to a 9K+ red line in order to make said power also causes the oft mentioned and touted as a 'benefit' (usually by the import/Nippon ONLY crews) and advantage over larger displacement, and/or pushrod engines (which do NOT have to be wound to the stratosphere) fuel mileage claim to fame to take a SERIOUS hit.
Thus negating that claimed 'advantage' (the higher one revs, the more fuel is needed, almost exponentially).
True. The combined freeway and city mpg of the OHV 2200 Cavalier and B16A2 Civic Si are virtually the same.
But the Civic is a riot at 8000 rpm. The Cavalier is no fun. It does enjoy about a 30ft-lb torque advantage for its extra 600cc. It is easier to drive from a standing start, but it is no fun.