Recent Topics
Looking for new oil/oil filter combo..
by radtech91
11/23/14 11:13 PM
Best atf for volvo 4t65ev/gt
by pjc360
11/23/14 10:43 PM
A New Cert mark for ILSAC GF-6B?
by wemay
11/23/14 10:24 PM
APPLES
by JHZR2
11/23/14 09:42 PM
where is the best deal on Dexron VI ?
by LScowboy
11/23/14 09:33 PM
Engines designed around oil?
by Throt
11/23/14 09:30 PM
Battery sprung a leak!
by JHZR2
11/23/14 09:30 PM
DVR for TV
by Jimkobb
11/23/14 09:10 PM
Newbie question on power bleeders for brake
by volodymyr
11/23/14 06:54 PM
Tire size variations
by GerGa
11/23/14 05:04 PM
Good video on Hit and Miss engines
by GreeCguy
11/23/14 05:03 PM
Injectors question
by chrisri
11/23/14 04:30 PM
Newest Members
kinder, SamBruin7, splatt, Lars65inc, dothedrew1202
51984 Registered Users
Who's Online
64 registered (ag_ghost, 147_Grain, BeerCan, Atlantis, Astro14, 6 invisible), 1147 Guests and 170 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
51984 Members
66 Forums
222540 Topics
3522274 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3102873 - 08/22/13 06:27 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 21537
Loc: NY
If that engine is used in GM as well as Chrysler products the price should come down according to the article. That would be great, the engine makes some nice power at low rpms and the mpg is great. What's not to like.
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops


Top
#3106072 - 08/26/13 11:19 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: demarpaint]
amr40509 Offline


Registered: 10/11/10
Posts: 30
Loc: ky
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
What was the up charge over the 3.6L Pentastar engine? I thought I read about $4,000, I'm wondering what the actual cost was to you? Thanks!


Base Engine: 3.6L V6 VVT ENGINE + 8-SPD AUTO 845RE TRANS (Standard)

3.0L V6 TURBO DIESEL ENGINE + 8-SPD AUTO 8HP70 TRANS [MSRP $4,500 / INV. $ 4,005]

5.7L V8 HEMI VVT ENGINE + 8-SPD AUTO 8HP70 TRANS [MSRP $2,695 / INV. $ 2,399]


Edited by amr40509 (08/26/13 11:19 AM)

Top
#3106079 - 08/26/13 11:36 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 21537
Loc: NY
Thanks, hopefully they sell a lot of them, and the price of the diesel engine comes down a bit. I think you've got a winner there!
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops


Top
#3122481 - 09/12/13 10:24 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
Boss302fan Offline


Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 1968
Loc: Oconomowoc Wi
That looks like a heck of a solid engine... Wow. Very nice.


Edited by Boss302fan (09/12/13 10:24 AM)
_________________________
John P
Wisconsin
2006 Lexus LS 430
1990 Jaguar XJS V12
2011 Hyundai Santa Fe V6
Other fun cars

Top
#3127598 - 09/17/13 01:57 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
BMWTurboDzl Offline


Registered: 04/15/10
Posts: 1326
Loc: Atlanta,GA
Castrol SLX available at BMW dealerships used to have this spec IIRC.
_________________________
'15 435i - Factory fill.
'10 335d (sold)

Top
#3127980 - 09/17/13 08:04 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: demarpaint]
3311 Offline


Registered: 07/24/10
Posts: 1040
Loc: Fl
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
If that engine is used in GM as well as Chrysler products the price should come down according to the article. That would be great, the engine makes some nice power at low rpms and the mpg is great. What's not to like.


I hope the price comes down as well. I have never been able to pull the trigger on a diesel because of the up charges and extra coin for fuel.
_________________________
04 2500hd 6.0 258k/12k Delo 5w40 XG3675 VML ATF PGL
03 C7500 Dmax7.8l 134k ST 15w40,M1ATF Dexcool
06 2500hd 6.0 197k ? 5w30 ST DexVI PGL

Top
#3154223 - 10/13/13 10:54 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
zeuloa Offline


Registered: 09/29/13
Posts: 101
Loc: Nicaragua
I'm sure ID parts will soon have the oil and maintenance kits for it. They seem to be a good source for diesels.

Top
#3166242 - 10/24/13 01:17 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: 3311]
jayg Offline


Registered: 10/04/12
Posts: 380
Loc: Acworth, GA
Originally Posted By: 3311
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
If that engine is used in GM as well as Chrysler products the price should come down according to the article. That would be great, the engine makes some nice power at low rpms and the mpg is great. What's not to like.


I hope the price comes down as well. I have never been able to pull the trigger on a diesel because of the up charges and extra coin for fuel.



The fuel costs are a wash because of the extra MPG. The extra charge for the motor is what takes a lot of driving to make back.

That being said I have 311,000 miles on the 7.3 van and it still runs like new.


Edited by jayg (10/24/13 01:18 PM)
_________________________
'14 Jeep Wrangler Sport S 6sp
'73 Datsun 240Z 4sp (AutoX)
'91 Honda CB250 Nighthawk (Cafe modded)


Top
#3192957 - 11/20/13 02:20 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
amr40509 Offline


Registered: 10/11/10
Posts: 30
Loc: ky
Just wanted to check back in now that I actually have the Jeep. I picked it up on the 10 days ago and have about 900 miles on it now, including one pretty good road trip out of town.

I'm not normally one to gush over an engine...but yeah...this thing is amazing! I'm getting low 20's around town. I drove 500 miles on the interstate at 75-85mph (except one burst up to 118 to see what speed she was limited to) with a FULL truck of big guys/coolers for a football game trip and got 27MPG. I think that 30+ should be expected under better conditions and more ginger driving. And power...The torque is ALWAYS there...and yes...it will spin the tires on dry pavement from a stop even though its full-time 4x4.

Top
#3194221 - 11/21/13 08:34 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: jayg]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 6935
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: jayg
Originally Posted By: 3311
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
If that engine is used in GM as well as Chrysler products the price should come down according to the article. That would be great, the engine makes some nice power at low rpms and the mpg is great. What's not to like.


I hope the price comes down as well. I have never been able to pull the trigger on a diesel because of the up charges and extra coin for fuel.



The fuel costs are a wash because of the extra MPG. The extra charge for the motor is what takes a lot of driving to make back.

That being said I have 311,000 miles on the 7.3 van and it still runs like new.

In addition, repair costs are a factor. If you need repairs for a diesel, they typically cost more than for gasoline engines.

However, only time will tell which gasoline and diesel engines have higher lifetime repair costs.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3194365 - 11/21/13 10:34 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
Clevy Offline


Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 7629
Loc: Saskatoon canada
That 3.0 engine right there would make me seriously consider buying a diesel truck. What a beautiful piece of engineering.
_________________________
2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter

Top
#3194471 - 11/22/13 05:23 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 15279
Loc: Sunny Florida
Agreed. It gives you some hope for diesels in the future if they keep refining them.

Still too new to tell, but I love that they are going outside their own engineering department and looking at innovative designs from other companies...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3194535 - 11/22/13 07:37 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: SteveSRT8]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 21537
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Agreed. It gives you some hope for diesels in the future if they keep refining them.

Still too new to tell, but I love that they are going outside their own engineering department and looking at innovative designs from other companies...


+1 If they end up going DI with the Pentastar I'll be looking real hard at the Diesel option if they offer it in the Wrangler next year.
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops


Top
#3194856 - 11/22/13 01:36 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: demarpaint]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 15279
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Agreed. It gives you some hope for diesels in the future if they keep refining them.

Still too new to tell, but I love that they are going outside their own engineering department and looking at innovative designs from other companies...


+1 If they end up going DI with the Pentastar I'll be looking real hard at the Diesel option if they offer it in the Wrangler next year.


You have to wonder if Chrysler is waiting to see what others do first, as the Pstar was their go-to powerplant for their future line up and yet does not have DI!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3194905 - 11/22/13 02:20 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: SteveSRT8]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 21537
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Agreed. It gives you some hope for diesels in the future if they keep refining them.

Still too new to tell, but I love that they are going outside their own engineering department and looking at innovative designs from other companies...


+1 If they end up going DI with the Pentastar I'll be looking real hard at the Diesel option if they offer it in the Wrangler next year.


You have to wonder if Chrysler is waiting to see what others do first, as the Pstar was their go-to powerplant for their future line up and yet does not have DI!


They have/had plans for DI in calendar year 2014-2016 according to Allpar. From what I read they were waiting for others to iron out their issues. I learned to pass on the first year of any new technology. Just because Chrysler decided to wait doesn't mean the first year DI Pstar will be problem free. Honestly I'd love to see them scrap the idea totally. hide
_________________________
GOD Bless our Troops


Top
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >