Gumout GDI Q&A Answers

click here for the Gumout GDI Q&A answers

Recent Topics
Collision event,
by otis24
22 minutes 10 seconds ago
The old America.
by OneEyeJack
40 minutes 15 seconds ago
5w30 Quaker State defy now API SN too!
by 901Memphis
46 minutes 33 seconds ago
synthetic blend in an e39 m5
by usce
Today at 03:50 PM
Beck/Arnley PCV valves - need your perspective?
by Georgiey22
Today at 03:46 PM
Astro Pneumatic 1/2" ONYX Nano Impact Wrench
by The Critic
Today at 03:46 PM
Shannow or other Aussies
by MinamiKotaro
Today at 03:16 PM
A Sensible Question for Gun Owners
by Bobcatguy
Today at 02:31 PM
Everyone having LED lights now?
by mclasser
Today at 02:29 PM
Time for rotors--what ones?
by supton
Today at 02:18 PM
Solar Impulse 2 reaches Hawaii, shatters records
by Benito
Today at 02:10 PM
Google earth download issue
by Eddie
Today at 11:17 AM
Newest Members
Trapperr, pewceo, Boothvmax89, Sheryl, Alberta411
54569 Registered Users
Who's Online
77 registered (AlienBug, andyd, b1amgm47, 3311, 01rangerxl, 2009Edge, 5 invisible), 1533 Guests and 89 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
54569 Members
66 Forums
233783 Topics
3755033 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3102873 - 08/22/13 06:27 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 22911
Loc: NY
If that engine is used in GM as well as Chrysler products the price should come down according to the article. That would be great, the engine makes some nice power at low rpms and the mpg is great. What's not to like.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3106072 - 08/26/13 11:19 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: demarpaint]
amr40509 Offline


Registered: 10/11/10
Posts: 30
Loc: ky
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
What was the up charge over the 3.6L Pentastar engine? I thought I read about $4,000, I'm wondering what the actual cost was to you? Thanks!


Base Engine: 3.6L V6 VVT ENGINE + 8-SPD AUTO 845RE TRANS (Standard)

3.0L V6 TURBO DIESEL ENGINE + 8-SPD AUTO 8HP70 TRANS [MSRP $4,500 / INV. $ 4,005]

5.7L V8 HEMI VVT ENGINE + 8-SPD AUTO 8HP70 TRANS [MSRP $2,695 / INV. $ 2,399]


Edited by amr40509 (08/26/13 11:19 AM)

Top
#3106079 - 08/26/13 11:36 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 22911
Loc: NY
Thanks, hopefully they sell a lot of them, and the price of the diesel engine comes down a bit. I think you've got a winner there!
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3122481 - 09/12/13 10:24 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
Boss302fan Offline


Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 2152
Loc: Oconomowoc Wi
That looks like a heck of a solid engine... Wow. Very nice.


Edited by Boss302fan (09/12/13 10:24 AM)
_________________________
John P
Wisconsin
2006 Lexus LS 430
1990 Jaguar XJS V12
2011 Hyundai Santa Fe V6
Other fun cars

Top
#3127598 - 09/17/13 01:57 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
BMWTurboDzl Offline


Registered: 04/15/10
Posts: 1589
Loc: Atlanta,GA
Castrol SLX available at BMW dealerships used to have this spec IIRC.
_________________________
'15 435i - BMW branded Shell 5w30.
Prev
'10 335d
'06 330i
'03 330i

Top
#3127980 - 09/17/13 08:04 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: demarpaint]
3311 Online   happy


Registered: 07/24/10
Posts: 1153
Loc: Fl
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
If that engine is used in GM as well as Chrysler products the price should come down according to the article. That would be great, the engine makes some nice power at low rpms and the mpg is great. What's not to like.


I hope the price comes down as well. I have never been able to pull the trigger on a diesel because of the up charges and extra coin for fuel.
_________________________
04 2500hd 6.0 271k/18k M1 10w40 XG3675 VML ATF PGL
03 C7500 Dmax7.8l 134k ST 15w40,M1ATF Dexcool
06 2500hd 6.0 207k ? 5w30 ST DexVI PGL

Top
#3154223 - 10/13/13 10:54 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
zeuloa Offline


Registered: 09/29/13
Posts: 101
Loc: Nicaragua
I'm sure ID parts will soon have the oil and maintenance kits for it. They seem to be a good source for diesels.

Top
#3166242 - 10/24/13 01:17 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: 3311]
jayg Offline


Registered: 10/04/12
Posts: 422
Loc: Acworth, GA
Originally Posted By: 3311
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
If that engine is used in GM as well as Chrysler products the price should come down according to the article. That would be great, the engine makes some nice power at low rpms and the mpg is great. What's not to like.


I hope the price comes down as well. I have never been able to pull the trigger on a diesel because of the up charges and extra coin for fuel.



The fuel costs are a wash because of the extra MPG. The extra charge for the motor is what takes a lot of driving to make back.

That being said I have 311,000 miles on the 7.3 van and it still runs like new.


Edited by jayg (10/24/13 01:18 PM)
_________________________
'14 Jeep Wrangler Sport S 6sp 10k OCI PYB 5w20
'73 Datsun 240Z 4sp (AutoX) Vintage QS 10w40
'91 Honda CB250 Nighthawk (Cafe modded)VBB 20w50


Top
#3192957 - 11/20/13 02:20 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
amr40509 Offline


Registered: 10/11/10
Posts: 30
Loc: ky
Just wanted to check back in now that I actually have the Jeep. I picked it up on the 10 days ago and have about 900 miles on it now, including one pretty good road trip out of town.

I'm not normally one to gush over an engine...but yeah...this thing is amazing! I'm getting low 20's around town. I drove 500 miles on the interstate at 75-85mph (except one burst up to 118 to see what speed she was limited to) with a FULL truck of big guys/coolers for a football game trip and got 27MPG. I think that 30+ should be expected under better conditions and more ginger driving. And power...The torque is ALWAYS there...and yes...it will spin the tires on dry pavement from a stop even though its full-time 4x4.

Top
#3194221 - 11/21/13 08:34 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: jayg]
artificialist Offline


Registered: 09/23/07
Posts: 7506
Loc: Florida
Originally Posted By: jayg
Originally Posted By: 3311
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
If that engine is used in GM as well as Chrysler products the price should come down according to the article. That would be great, the engine makes some nice power at low rpms and the mpg is great. What's not to like.


I hope the price comes down as well. I have never been able to pull the trigger on a diesel because of the up charges and extra coin for fuel.



The fuel costs are a wash because of the extra MPG. The extra charge for the motor is what takes a lot of driving to make back.

That being said I have 311,000 miles on the 7.3 van and it still runs like new.

In addition, repair costs are a factor. If you need repairs for a diesel, they typically cost more than for gasoline engines.

However, only time will tell which gasoline and diesel engines have higher lifetime repair costs.
_________________________
2010 Lancer Ralliart Sportback

Top
#3194365 - 11/21/13 10:34 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
Clevy Offline


Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 9155
Loc: Saskatoon canada
That 3.0 engine right there would make me seriously consider buying a diesel truck. What a beautiful piece of engineering.
_________________________
2006 Charger RT
Miles x 2 per oil filter

Top
#3194471 - 11/22/13 05:23 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: amr40509]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 16407
Loc: Sunny Florida
Agreed. It gives you some hope for diesels in the future if they keep refining them.

Still too new to tell, but I love that they are going outside their own engineering department and looking at innovative designs from other companies...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3194535 - 11/22/13 07:37 AM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: SteveSRT8]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 22911
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Agreed. It gives you some hope for diesels in the future if they keep refining them.

Still too new to tell, but I love that they are going outside their own engineering department and looking at innovative designs from other companies...


+1 If they end up going DI with the Pentastar I'll be looking real hard at the Diesel option if they offer it in the Wrangler next year.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3194856 - 11/22/13 01:36 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: demarpaint]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 16407
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Agreed. It gives you some hope for diesels in the future if they keep refining them.

Still too new to tell, but I love that they are going outside their own engineering department and looking at innovative designs from other companies...


+1 If they end up going DI with the Pentastar I'll be looking real hard at the Diesel option if they offer it in the Wrangler next year.


You have to wonder if Chrysler is waiting to see what others do first, as the Pstar was their go-to powerplant for their future line up and yet does not have DI!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3194905 - 11/22/13 02:20 PM Re: 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee - VM 3.0L Turbo Diesel [Re: SteveSRT8]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 22911
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
Agreed. It gives you some hope for diesels in the future if they keep refining them.

Still too new to tell, but I love that they are going outside their own engineering department and looking at innovative designs from other companies...


+1 If they end up going DI with the Pentastar I'll be looking real hard at the Diesel option if they offer it in the Wrangler next year.


You have to wonder if Chrysler is waiting to see what others do first, as the Pstar was their go-to powerplant for their future line up and yet does not have DI!


They have/had plans for DI in calendar year 2014-2016 according to Allpar. From what I read they were waiting for others to iron out their issues. I learned to pass on the first year of any new technology. Just because Chrysler decided to wait doesn't mean the first year DI Pstar will be problem free. Honestly I'd love to see them scrap the idea totally. hide
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >