Originally Posted By: Rand
one flaw in your argument.. you are using OEM All seasons which are usually on the wrong side of mediocre at best and biased for high MPG.
I am not using them; I threw them out while they were barely worn. They were Michelin MXM tires, their speed rating was V.
The main thoroughfare on the hill where we live (Portland, Oregon) is SW Vista Avenue, which runs from West Burnside at the north to SW Patton Road about 2/3 or 3/4 of the way up the hill. The first (long) block going southward from Burnside has a pretty fair uphill grade and comes to a traffic light at SW Park Place. You can see it on Google Street View. During the period that we had those Michelin all-season tires on our car, if I had to stop at that light when the pavement was wet, I
could not keep from getting some wheel spin when the light turned green and I tried to accelerate from a full stop -- and believe me, I really
tried, I did, to keep the wheels from spinning. I
never have experienced wheel spin at that intersection when our car was shod with non-all-season tires, even in near-freezing temperatures.
Originally Posted By: Rand
and you are over-generalizing way too much.
my factory oem tires had less traction dry than my replacements have in the rain... both of which are all seasons.
Then your replacements also have poor wet traction.
The problem is inherent in the design of all all-season tires. The natural state of rubber compounds is that they are hydrophobic -- that is, water does not stick to rubber, but naturally runs off. Think of the rain slickers that the traffic cops wear, which usually are rubber-coated. That property is helpful in helping tire treads to evacuate water on the pavement and make an intimate contact between the tire and pavement possible. A famous tire commercial in the 1950s demonstrated that you could actually light a kitchen match on the track a tire makes when it crosses wet pavement.
That same hydrophobic quality, however, is not helpful on snow. The pressure exerted from the mass of the car makes snow melt to water at the molecular level in the contact patch, and a hydrophobic tire can get no traction on the water. So hydrophilic ("water-loving") rubber compounds were invented, and that is the kind of compound used in the treads of all-season tires; it is the employment of hydrophilic tread compounds that enables all-season tires to gain traction on snow. All all-season tires have hydrophilic tread compounds.
Where the pavement is covered with water, not snow, however, you really want the tire to
shed the water, not to "love" it. (See the paragraph above starting, "the problem ...") All-season tires love water so much that they pick up water from the pavement, carry it around a full revolution, and still retain a film of water when the same patch again is the contact patch. Result: a water-to-water interface at the contact patch, rather than a rubber-to-asphalt interface at the contact patch. Water is a fair lubricant, and traction suffers.
We rented a crossover SUV at Dallas Ft. Worth International Airport in the spring; of course, it was shod with all-season tires. Just as I got into the car, a spring shower passed through; the shower was over in maybe five minutes, and we had sunshine with wet pavement. There, somewhere between Grapevine and Flower Mound, I made a 90° left turn onto a county road (because of the high center of gravity of the SUV and considerable lean, I slowed 'way down to make the corner), and found myself at the top of a small, not-terribly-steep hill with a stop sign at the bottom, about 75 yards ahead. I coasted halfway down (no need to accelerate, because of the grade) and applied the brakes to stop -- but did not stop short of the sign. Although I assume the modern vehicle had ABS, all four wheels locked, and I slipped and slid right through the intersection; fortunately, there was no cross-traffic. All-season tires.
Originally Posted By: Rand
Also most summer tires are performance summer tires which means they basically get hard and ""plastic"" like when it approaches freezing.
If by "performance" you mean that they are capable of stopping in relatively short distances on wet pavement, yes, most non-all-season tires are "performance" tires. But you are wrong that all non-all-season tires' rubber compounds get hard and "plastic" when temperatures approach freezing. (Yokohama ADVAN Neova and other "Extreme Performance" tires excepted.) In common with all rubber compounds, the compounds in non-all-season tires do get hard
er at near-freezing temperatures than they are at higher temperatures, but
the same is true of the rubber compounds in all-season tires. The compounds of our non-all-season tires (currently, we are running Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT tires) are softer at moderate ambient temperatures (50s to 90s F.) than the compounds of just about all all-season tires; and as the temperatures go down into the 40s and 30s (F.), the compounds of
both the all-season tires and the non-all-season tires get harder, and the compound of our SP Sport Max TT tires
remains relatively softer than the rubber compounds of typical all season tires.
Originally Posted By: Rand
Also you neglect to differentiate between performance winter and max traction type winter tires.
When there is snow on the ground just about
all winter tires, whether "performance winter" tires or "max traction type winter" tires are superior to just about
any all-season tire, and certainly superior to what you call a "summer" tire; I did not "neglect" to make the distinction among types of true winter tires: the distinction is simply of no relevance whatsoever to the discussion we are having here.
Originally Posted By: Rand
I would put a good performance winter up against almost any summer tire at 35F
The temperature you have chosen is a pretty good reference point for discussion. If the temperature is going to
stay at 35°, I agree with you that the tires I would prefer to be fitted to my car would be true winter tires. But the temperature rarely hangs around at that level, and it does not take a lot of heat before true winter tires start "chunking" (pieces of the tread breaking off at speed) because, just as non-winter tires' rubber compounds get hard as decreasing temperatures approach freezing, winter tires' softer tread compounds get softer, much softer, as the tires warm up. And most winter tires do not dissipate the heat generated from flexion in high speed driving as well as non-winter tires do.
Originally Posted By: Rand
I would put a good all a season tire up against most summer tires at 35F also. Rain, dry whatever.
And it would lose out in traction tests time after time; such tests have been conducted, and the all-season tire almost always loses. On that same Vista Avenue, farther up the hill, in the S-turn above where Montgomery Drive crosses Vista, on a day the weather was in the 30s and the pavement was wet, I had a new SUV, either Acura or Lexus (I have a hard time keeping them apart) following me; it had been behind me all the way from the traffic light at Park Place, and could not have been going
too fast, because he was following me.
In my rear-view mirror, I saw him execute a perfect 360° spin; it was really quite entertaining, in an Olympic figure-skating kind of way. All-season tires, I presume. On my non-all-season tires, I was getting no slip at all.
Originally Posted By: Rand
The key part of the sentence is "a good tire"
Then we are no longer talking about all-season tires.
Originally Posted By: Rand
In the bigger picture the region obiviously plays a huge role in your tire choice..
If I lived in florida or california. I would most likely have summer tires.
where I live we get 65F in january as well as -5f
we get 80F in september as well as below freezing.
There is no tire made that is optimal at both 80°F and below-freezing temperatures, none.
Originally Posted By: Rand
therefore I run a "GOOD" all season tire
Oxymoron alert.
Originally Posted By: Rand
as well as a dedicated winter for the worst part of winter. mid-nov to end of march.
Your choice of tire for November to March is a wise one.