Originally Posted By: xxch4osxx
Originally Posted By: crw
I wonder why more lines aren't buried? When I was growing up in the Seattle suburbs (1970's) all of my neighborhood had no overhead lines where the weather could impact them. But where I live today, in Idaho, overhead lines are still all over.
I think cost has alot to do with it. It costs alot more to bury them plus when repairs are needed, they have to dig them up again, also increasing costs. When they are out in the open, it is much easier to spot problems and work on them right away.
There's usually no digging involved in replacing cable. Most underground cables are in conduit. Workers can access the cable at a transformer, splice box, or other equipment and pull the cable through the conduit. Some old cable is direct buried, but it's becoming less common. Underground systems are a lot more expensive to install, and they're harder to diagnose when something goes wrong, since you can't readily see failed components as you would on an overhead system. And things DO go wrong, they're not the pinnacle of reliability everyone loves to think they are. Transformers melt down, cable insulation breaks down, there's water intrusion, etc etc. I'm not a lineman, but I am an engineer for an electric utility.