Originally Posted By: BISCUT
Something that needs to be brought into the discussion is that many perceptions of the AR/M16 are based upon older models and/or MIL M16's armorers are keeping together with way to many rounds thur them that should realistically be retired....and before some of you say well, they shoot dont they? Ask yourself if you were headed to war would you want one of those or a modern Colt/LMT/Noveske.
That's actually a pretty good point.
The 1911s that were issued when I first joined the service immediately come to mind -- They were probably 50 years old, loose as can be, and felt like they were going to fall apart. The M9s were a night and day improvement.
Most of our M16A1s were the same way. They were clearly ready to be retired (most were Franken-weapons with various A2 replacement parts) by the time we got our A2s. During qualifications, it paid off to be a grenadier, because the M16A1s w/203 weren't nearly as worn out.