Originally Posted By: A_Harman
The GMC 305 has colossal bearings for a low-compression gasoline engine. (Actually it has colossal everything for a low-compression gasoline engine.) The bearings for that engine series were the same from the 305 gas all the way up to the 478 diesel. For 150hp out of 305 cubic inches, I can see why a 20-weight oil would work.
But out of respect for the solid flat-tappet valvetrain, I would not rush out and put in an SM/SN Xw20 oil. You could buy an SN Xw20 and supplement it with a zddp additive (ZDDPlus or Red Line Oil Break-In additive). High-zddp 20-weight oils are very rare because that grade is mostly formulated to comply with API specs for Phosphorous content. My usual recommendations for high-zddp gasoline oils are Valvoline VR1 or Brad Penn, but neither of those are available in 20-weight. Red Line 5w20 or 0w20 would be possibilities, if you want to spend the extra money.
By the way, do you post over on the 6066 GMC Guy board? I'm on that site from time to time.
This is an interesting idea. Design an engine with a variety of potential power outputs and duty levels, both Diesel and gasoline, and the least powerful version is the one built in the largest quantity. When you think about the heavy duty engines from Ford (360/390) and Chevy (396, 427) they may have been light duty engines first, and modified for heavy duty use.
With today's business logic, the GMC light duty line would have gotten the same inline 6's and 283 V8's as Chevys. I'm sure glad at this time it was important to somebody for GMC to have its own identity.
This engine in 145 HP (305 A) and 165 HP (305 D) appears very undestressed. The crank, rods, and block are very substantial pieces that seem to have potential for very long life.
The strange thing about this motor is that it doesn't have the character of a truck motor. It is way oversquare with a 4.25" bore and a 3.5" stroke. It isn't a low end torque stump puller like truck motors are reputed. It likes to rev and hums along happily at highway speeds.
The bearings are big and offer lots of area for a low stressed engine. It would be interesting to see if the viscosity recommendations get heavier in the higher horsepower versions of this engine. I also wonder if owners were compliant or reluctant in abiding by the 20 weight oil spec.
I had an owner's manual for this truck since I bought it in 1978. I thought the 20 weight spec strange. My impression was 20 weight was what you ran in the winter before multi viscosity oil came out. I suppose I just decided 10W40 was a universal oil back then. It didn't kill it.
Even now I and most response are hesitant to use the recommended oil, but this hesitance is partly due to zddp levels. There are no high zddp level 5W20 oils since the first ones were SJ oils, and zddp levels have been trending down since. The perfect oil for this engine may be a 10W20 with minimal or no viscosity improvers, and over 1000 ppm of zinc. The closest thing would be a straight 20W HDEO.
Low oil temps could be a factor in the 20 weight spec, as well as the large bearing area. With 33 quarts of coolant and capacity for greater horsepower, the oil temps could be low. I'll have to do some testing on that. I may be looking for 20 weight HDEO if the oil temps hover around 160 F.