Originally Posted By: dailydriver
Originally Posted By: leeharvey418
Being in North 'Jersey, the Hakkapelitta R (replacement of the RSi) is probably more winter tire than you really need. Unless you're driving inland to go skiing or something, the Nokian WR G2 or any of the Performance Winter tires on the market would probably suit your needs better than a full-on winter tire that's not so great on just wet or dry pavement.
I would agree with you
IF I were driving an AWD/FWD low powered/low numerically gear ratioed car.
THIS car
needs MUCH MORE traction (370+ hp/torque
to the wheels, 3.73 axle ratio, 54/46 weight ditribution) to go up a snowy/icy incline than the high performance, H rated winter rubber could ever possibly muster, EVEN brand new.
How do I know this, you ask? My current winter setup is Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2s on the stock snowflake alloys.
Like you've stated; GREAT on cold, dry pavement, all but useless on snowy/icy inclines.
That being said, I would be willing to try the WR G2s over the Rs
IF I could be money back
guaranteed in writing that they have MORE bite than the BEST OF the rest of the H rated hi-po winter donuts out there.
Well Considering i have a very torquey VQ35 in the altima coupe, im going to need something to cope with that power,the stockers are 215/55/17 IDK dont ask me why such a tall aspect ratio. for the snow tires i dont want too scratch my new wheels up. I usually start off in second if its really bad, but let off the clutch in first real slow and fell it bite and ease into the throttle. IDK if i want to keep OEM size tires for the WINTERS or change it, problem being no more money. so i most likely would habe to go with OEM size, which if you think about it has tall sidewall not goos for performance but good for snow. what do you guys think GUYS? BTW Nokians i know are great but they are quite pricey for the Grambo Budget.