2003 GMC Envoy - 4.2L 6cyl - 3,200 miles

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
46
Location
Queens, NY
code:

Vehicle: 2003 GMC Envoy

Engine: 4.2L 6-cylinder

Miles on Vehicle: 31,195

Miles On Oil: ~3,200

Oil: Mobil 1 5W-30 SS

Filter: Mobil 1

Oil in use from mid-September 2003 through 11/12/03



Measured Average

Aluminum 3 4

Chromium 2 1

Iron 13 52

Copper 9 14

Lead 1 2

Tin 0 2

Molybdenum 11 41

Nickel 0 0

Manganese 0 1

Silver 0 0

Titanium 0 0

Potassium 0 1

Boron 13 40

Silicon 51 12

Sodium 3 7

Calcium 1942 1933

Magnesium 68 377

Phosphorus 965 745

Zinc 1098 912

Barium 0 1



SUS Vis @ 210F 62.0 54-61

Flashpoint 385 >365

Fuel%
Antifreeze% 0 0.0

Water% 0.0 0.0

Insoulbles% 0.2
TBN Ordered, but not reported.



Analysis:

The only question we have on this initial oil

sample from your GM 4.2L engine is, where did all

the silicon come from? These types of GM engines

average 12 ppm silicon. If the 51 ppm found in

this sample were abrasive dirt, it would have a

serious effect on bearing wear. With all the

metals reading low, easily better than average,

we thiink the silicon is from a silicone product

like an additive or sealer material. Other than

the high silicon, this is the perfect analysis

for your engine after running the oil 3,200

miles. Try 5,000 miles next sample. Wear will

still read okay.



My comments:

This vehicle has a 7-quart capacity, which seems

pretty huge to me. Also, the dealer recently had

to drop the oil pan, before this OCI, in order to

replace the front differential casing. Maybe

they put in a new gasket or something which

contributed to the elevated silicon? Discuss.


 
Excellent numbers. Why is the Moly only 11? Are the numbers backwards? Oil is on the thicker side, something we are seeing often with Mobil 1. I agree that the silicon must be from something inside the engine. Iron is very good too.
wink.gif


[ November 22, 2003, 07:42 PM: Message edited by: buster ]
 
That's a lot of iron for a 3000 mile test with a 7 quart sump ....If you normalize that wear rate to a 5 quart sump, you'd have 18 ppm of iron in 3000 miles or 6 ppm/1000 miles. Not good at all for a 4 liter engine....

I have to wonder about the Blackstone techs who write their comments - I'm thinking they must have been liberal arts majors in school ...
wink.gif


Tooslick
Dixie Synthetics
 
Buster,

It's a wonder you passed algebra...
wink.gif


If you take that data and extrapolate the results to a 10,000 mile change interval with a 5 qt sump, you'd get 60 ppm of iron. That's what I'd call an extremely high rate of iron wear for a four liter engine ...

Ted
 
Tooslick, it's a GM engine. Algebra was cake.
wink.gif
You yourself have in fact said many times that these engines show high wear numbers.

[ November 22, 2003, 08:18 PM: Message edited by: buster ]
 
Buster,

It's a little bit of both, but I'd say it's mostly an inability to formulate a decent antiwear additive chemistry. As I have said, Delvac 1 is a far superior product, but it's $5.50/qt commercially and not $3.75/qt retail at Walmart ...Can't make a silk purse out of a sows ear ...

The problem is that Mobil has been living off their laurels for 25 years and has little real competition at retail outlets....

Ted
 
quote:

The problem is that Mobil has been living off their laurels for 25 years and has little real competition at retail outlets....

Agree, thanks.
cheers.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top