lomez
Thread starter
I'm only making in more complex because in addition to the HTHS #s, I'm concerned about flow...thus coverage. As we know, all the shear numbers in the world don't matter, if there's no coverage, because there's no flow, and oil is bypassing the pump. That was sort of the point I was going at, in the beginning.
So, it turns out that the HTHS for the Motul 15W50 (I'm currently running) is 5.33 That's great, but the kinematic viscosity at 100 C. is claimed 18, while viscosity at 40 C. is claimed 128. The manual calls for 10W40, and that 15W40, 20W40 and 20W50 are acceptable in summer. I wonder how a 100 C. viscosity of 14 (typical 10W40) compares, in terms of protection/coverage, to a 100 C viscosity of 18? Probably no measurable difference, except in fuel economy?
For comparison:
Mobil 1 5W40
HTHS- 3.8
100 C- 13.4
40 C- 81
Mobil 1 10W40
HTHS- 4.0
100 C Visc.- 14
40 C visc.- 82
Mobil 1 20W50
HTHS- 4.5
100 C Visc 18
40 C Visc- 125
Motul 5W40
HTHS- 4.51
100 C visc- 14
40 C Visc- 81
Mobil 1 0W50
HTHS- 4.1
Vis@100- 17
Visc@40- 100
So, it turns out that the HTHS for the Motul 15W50 (I'm currently running) is 5.33 That's great, but the kinematic viscosity at 100 C. is claimed 18, while viscosity at 40 C. is claimed 128. The manual calls for 10W40, and that 15W40, 20W40 and 20W50 are acceptable in summer. I wonder how a 100 C. viscosity of 14 (typical 10W40) compares, in terms of protection/coverage, to a 100 C viscosity of 18? Probably no measurable difference, except in fuel economy?
For comparison:
Mobil 1 5W40
HTHS- 3.8
100 C- 13.4
40 C- 81
Mobil 1 10W40
HTHS- 4.0
100 C Visc.- 14
40 C visc.- 82
Mobil 1 20W50
HTHS- 4.5
100 C Visc 18
40 C Visc- 125
Motul 5W40
HTHS- 4.51
100 C visc- 14
40 C Visc- 81
Mobil 1 0W50
HTHS- 4.1
Vis@100- 17
Visc@40- 100