Recent Topics
Need a Good 2stroke oil
by Samf333
04/23/14 01:37 AM
Hawaiian Airlines Flight 45
by Merkava_4
04/23/14 12:07 AM
Check those filters when buying!
by Pat in Speedway
04/22/14 11:42 PM
Straight Weight Oil
by outoforder
04/22/14 11:19 PM
The High Mile Club
by Nick1994
04/22/14 10:43 PM
Ordered Archoil
by domer10
04/22/14 10:29 PM
Mobil 1 0W30 AFE 6020 Miles 06 Toyota Tacoma V6
by qnyla
04/22/14 10:14 PM
Trip to NAPA today - new oil buying paradigm?
by SilverC6
04/22/14 10:06 PM
PWC ramp/dock
by Barkleymut
04/22/14 09:56 PM
15w40 Supertech
by Mackelroy
04/22/14 09:45 PM
Rebuilt engine warranty
by Stelth
04/22/14 08:50 PM
1997 Honda Civic EX 1.6L VTEC help
by Truck25Engine
04/22/14 08:43 PM
Newest Members
Defrazie, greenglower, rboone, Williema, mrpowderkeg
49669 Registered Users
Who's Online
28 registered (dave180, dnewton3, Char Baby, bruno, ajwan, 4 invisible), 604 Guests and 180 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
49669 Members
64 Forums
212306 Topics
3327901 Posts

Max Online: 2651 @ 04/21/14 04:38 PM
Donate to BITOG

Topic Options
#1937013 - 06/28/10 10:36 PM Chrysler 300 engine noise
tig1 Offline


Registered: 01/03/09
Posts: 9495
Loc: Illinois
Rented a Chrysler 300 today as the Fusion went in for body repair for hail damage. Was on the interstate today(I 270) and romped her going up sunset hill near Il 157. The engine in the 300 is very nice with normal driving, but hard throtle I noticed the engine had a lot of mechanical noise. Didn't care for that, but all in all the 300 is a nice ride.


Edited by tig1 (06/28/10 10:39 PM)
_________________________
2007 Ford Fusion 134,000 miles
M1 0-20
2007 Ford Focus 122,000 miles
M1 0-20
10,000 mile OCIs on both engines
M1 ATF
M1 10-30 in all OPE

Top
#1937016 - 06/28/10 10:37 PM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: tig1]
Nick R Offline


Registered: 07/14/09
Posts: 10275
Loc: Saratoga, NY
Which engine was it? 2.7L? 3.5L? 5.7L? Some engines have a lot of accessory drive noise. (The Malibu with the 2.4L comes to mind)
_________________________
13 Ford Focus SE 2.0L/27,000miles/Valvoline Synpower 0W-20/MC FL-910S
13 Chevy Traverse 3.6L/12,000mi/QSUD 5W-30/FRAM Ultra
11 Chevy Cruze 1.4T/26k

Top
#1937017 - 06/28/10 10:38 PM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: Nick R]
tig1 Offline


Registered: 01/03/09
Posts: 9495
Loc: Illinois
Originally Posted By: Nick R
Which engine was it? 2.7L? 3.5L? 5.7L? Some engines have a lot of accessory drive noise. (The Malibu with the 2.4L comes to mind)


Sorry, 3.5.
_________________________
2007 Ford Fusion 134,000 miles
M1 0-20
2007 Ford Focus 122,000 miles
M1 0-20
10,000 mile OCIs on both engines
M1 ATF
M1 10-30 in all OPE

Top
#1937019 - 06/28/10 10:41 PM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: tig1]
Nick R Offline


Registered: 07/14/09
Posts: 10275
Loc: Saratoga, NY


Edited by Nick R (06/28/10 10:45 PM)
_________________________
13 Ford Focus SE 2.0L/27,000miles/Valvoline Synpower 0W-20/MC FL-910S
13 Chevy Traverse 3.6L/12,000mi/QSUD 5W-30/FRAM Ultra
11 Chevy Cruze 1.4T/26k

Top
#1937116 - 06/29/10 04:28 AM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: tig1]
Johnny Offline


Registered: 05/27/02
Posts: 14013
Loc: Retired | Wausau, WI
To bad about the hail damage. I know that made your day.

Top
#1937182 - 06/29/10 07:47 AM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: tig1]
440Magnum Offline


Registered: 02/01/09
Posts: 5776
Loc: Texas
Originally Posted By: tig1
Rented a Chrysler 300 today as the Fusion went in for body repair for hail damage. Was on the interstate today(I 270) and romped her going up sunset hill near Il 157. The engine in the 300 is very nice with normal driving, but hard throtle I noticed the engine had a lot of mechanical noise. Didn't care for that, but all in all the 300 is a nice ride.


My wife owned a first-generation 3.5 (iron block) for 260,000 wonderful miles. The auto rags have always claimed that it is "noisy," but at least what we always heard was induction and exhaust noise- nice and throaty when you get on it, silent when just cruising. I've spent relatively little time behind the wheel of the 2nd gen 3.5, but I really liked what I heard and felt. What drives me batty are all these cars I rent now where when you get the RPM up all you can hear is timing chain or belt whine, transmission gear noise, and power steering pump noise.
_________________________
'66 Dodge Polara & '69 Dodge Coronet R/T both 440/727
'08 Ram 1500 4.7/545RFE
'12 Challenger SRT8 392/6-speed
'99 Cherokee 4.0, '11 Grand Cherokee 3.6

Top
#1937457 - 06/29/10 12:33 PM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: Nick R]
mopar_monkey Offline


Registered: 06/08/10
Posts: 750
Loc: oregon
Originally Posted By: Nick R


sounds pretty good!

Top
#1937920 - 06/29/10 09:02 PM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: mopar_monkey]
CROWNVIC4LIFE Offline


Registered: 04/13/09
Posts: 3735
Loc: Miami-Dade County
The 5.7 is the only engine that belongs in the 300...A friend has a 07 with the 5.7 and its the perfect engine for it...I have no clue why Chrysler puts the 2.7 in it...Even the 300 rental cars should have at least the 3.5 in it.
_________________________
05 Ford Crown Vic
5W20 Motorcraft Full Synthetic
Bosh D3410 Filter

07 Merc Grand Marquis
5W20 Motorcraft Full Synthetic
Motorcraft Filter.


Top
#1937998 - 06/29/10 10:01 PM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: CROWNVIC4LIFE]
mrsilv04 Offline


Registered: 12/08/06
Posts: 5886
Loc: Illinois
Originally Posted By: CROWNVIC4LIFE
The 5.7 is the only engine that belongs in the 300...A friend has a 07 with the 5.7 and its the perfect engine for it...I have no clue why Chrysler puts the 2.7 in it...Even the 300 rental cars should have at least the 3.5 in it.


It appears that they did it to be able to compete price-wise in their class.

Considering all base model vehicles with 3.5 liter engines:

Charger - $25995 MSRP
Impala - $24290 MSRP
Taurus - $25170 MSRP

MSRP for the Charger with a 2.7 drops to $25140.

But I agree... when all of your direct competition uses a 3.5 for their base engines... even offering 2.7 is a little odd.

But we are talking about Chrysler. shrug
_________________________

President of the Illinois chapter of 'Motorcyclists for Global Warming'.

Top
#1938389 - 06/30/10 09:05 AM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: mrsilv04]
CROWNVIC4LIFE Offline


Registered: 04/13/09
Posts: 3735
Loc: Miami-Dade County
Originally Posted By: mrsilv04
Originally Posted By: CROWNVIC4LIFE
The 5.7 is the only engine that belongs in the 300...A friend has a 07 with the 5.7 and its the perfect engine for it...I have no clue why Chrysler puts the 2.7 in it...Even the 300 rental cars should have at least the 3.5 in it.


It appears that they did it to be able to compete price-wise in their class.

Considering all base model vehicles with 3.5 liter engines:

Charger - $25995 MSRP
Impala - $24290 MSRP
Taurus - $25170 MSRP

MSRP for the Charger with a 2.7 drops to $25140.

But I agree... when all of your direct competition uses a 3.5 for their base engines... even offering 2.7 is a little odd.

But we are talking about Chrysler. shrug


Your probably right as it keeps the price down...One P.D. got a 2.7 Charger for a unmarked car...The driver of it hated it...Most PD's here get the 3.5 at least.
_________________________
05 Ford Crown Vic
5W20 Motorcraft Full Synthetic
Bosh D3410 Filter

07 Merc Grand Marquis
5W20 Motorcraft Full Synthetic
Motorcraft Filter.


Top
#1938394 - 06/30/10 09:07 AM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: mrsilv04]
meep Offline


Registered: 02/20/07
Posts: 2395
Loc: Southeast
I like the 3.5. drove a ...95-96? LHS for a few months. Dual exh to the muffler, single pipe behind that. dual intakes, each one serving 3 cylinders... that engine was a dream to open up, and had one of the nicest v6 gurgles I've heard.

Belt-driven cams.


Edited by meep (06/30/10 09:07 AM)
_________________________
2006 Tundra 2wd
2002 MDX (wifey!)
2003 town and country, in various state of repair

Top
#1939621 - 07/01/10 11:06 AM Re: Chrysler 300 engine noise [Re: meep]
440Magnum Offline


Registered: 02/01/09
Posts: 5776
Loc: Texas
I agree that the 2.7 really doesn't belong in the LX cars at all. It doesn't even get better fuel economy than the 3.5 because its working so dang hard all the time, and it really sucks to drive. But I don't think the 5.7 is the "only" engine that belongs there (don't forget the 6.1 after all :-) Seriously- the 3.5 is the perfect base engine for that car- more than enough power to get out of its way, but better efficiency than the 5.7. Especially if they'd have paired the 3.5 with a 5-speed automatic more often than they did. Then the 3.5 HO is a good low/mid range step up, then the 5.7, and of course the 6.1 for the SRT-8 versions.

I think the offering of the 2.7 was almost entirely geared to fleet (translation: rental car) sales.

_________________________
'66 Dodge Polara & '69 Dodge Coronet R/T both 440/727
'08 Ram 1500 4.7/545RFE
'12 Challenger SRT8 392/6-speed
'99 Cherokee 4.0, '11 Grand Cherokee 3.6

Top