Tempest, you keep insist that people are supporting corn ethanol when they are against it just because it is non-market. You are drawing a circle around you that everything you don't like are grouped into one called "commie/corrupt/socialist/corn ethanol/liberal". That is far from the case here.
About the tree chopping thing: do you think if someone own a mountain and he chop down all the trees, and causes mud slide during rain storm and results in property damage down stream is acceptable in a complete "capitalist" market? Sure, he owns the land, he can do whatever he wants, and is not responsible for the land downstream. If the government is not regulating certain damage that can cause safety issues like these, you are getting exactly the same damage as "no property right" in the tyranny that you call non-capitalist.
How do you cherry pick what is capitalist and not by picking only good examples, and disregard every side effect of your extreme believe, of an utopia of capitalist without government that doesn't exist?
The reality is far from this extreme, just like the believe of ideal communism is.
About the tree chopping thing: do you think if someone own a mountain and he chop down all the trees, and causes mud slide during rain storm and results in property damage down stream is acceptable in a complete "capitalist" market? Sure, he owns the land, he can do whatever he wants, and is not responsible for the land downstream. If the government is not regulating certain damage that can cause safety issues like these, you are getting exactly the same damage as "no property right" in the tyranny that you call non-capitalist.
How do you cherry pick what is capitalist and not by picking only good examples, and disregard every side effect of your extreme believe, of an utopia of capitalist without government that doesn't exist?
The reality is far from this extreme, just like the believe of ideal communism is.