I wish Home Depot would tighten their return policy. We take back all sorts of [censored] that we shouldn't. Stuff that people have tossed into their workshop and fogotten for 6 months and long since misplaced the receipt, dead plants (which I think is total B.S.), and mowers and trimmers that they're too inept to make run correctly. We took back a Troybilt lawnmower that hadn't even cut a blade of grass yet, because the purchaser couldn't get it to start. Just out of curiosity, I pulled the dipstick to see if they had installed the included bottle of oil. Oh yes, they did...and then some. It was full all the way to the top of the dipstick tube. I had a guy come in tuesday that wanted to return a trimmer that he'd been using for a year, claming that it had been hard to start and nearly impossible to keep running since it was new. Um...pardon the stupid question, but why struggle with something for a YEAR before bringing it back? The real story was probably more like it had just started acting up that week and he felt he deserved a new one. There's no telling what he'd done to it.
I imagine the reason NAPA did this is because of the useless [censored] people are bringing back for a refund. Destroyed packaging, dusty, dirty and basically unsellable items that will have to be written off was probably costing them millions a year. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and with the economy driving people to return anything they can get their hands on, something had to give. I have no problem with it, because it only takes me a few minutes to determine if what I purchased is correct and can be used for the purpose for which I bought it. If it's wrong, or defective, I don't throw it on a shelf and wait 5 days to do something with it. Perhaps policies like this will teach people how expensive it can be to procrastinate.
I imagine the reason NAPA did this is because of the useless [censored] people are bringing back for a refund. Destroyed packaging, dusty, dirty and basically unsellable items that will have to be written off was probably costing them millions a year. The line has to be drawn somewhere, and with the economy driving people to return anything they can get their hands on, something had to give. I have no problem with it, because it only takes me a few minutes to determine if what I purchased is correct and can be used for the purpose for which I bought it. If it's wrong, or defective, I don't throw it on a shelf and wait 5 days to do something with it. Perhaps policies like this will teach people how expensive it can be to procrastinate.