Originally Posted By: Titan
Why make it more complicated?
Couldn't the same be asked of Ford when switching the spec from 5w-30 to 5w20? Why make it more complicated?
It's an evolutionary thing. There is obviously some advantage in the 5w-20 over the previously sped'd 5w-30 how ever slight. My question is in that vein. Isn't it reasonable to wonder if 0w-20 is > 5w-20 is > 5w-30, in the same sense, with respect to this engine?
I doubt Ford would spec the engine to 0w-20 yet because that would mandate synthetic oil, since there are currently no dino or synth-blends available in that rating. If there were, or the cost disparity were neglibible, it's possible Ford would recommend the use of 0w-20.
I'm sure all mainstream vehicles, excluding high performance, diesel, turbo etc, can probably live well on PB's Shell/Proline deal for $10 observing an OCI of 5000 miles. No real fascination in that level of simplicity nor the need for a $20 oil analysis either. As enthusiasts we like the technology, the experimental data and the future. That's the spirit of a site like this and that's the spirit of my question.
I mean all this respectfully by the way and I appreciate the response. I just wanted to clearly restate what I was asking since longevity wasn't my main purpose for the question.