Barstool Economics

Status
Not open for further replies.

jaj

Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
1,059
Location
Vancouver, Canada
Someone sent me this the other day.

Our Tax System Explained

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers,' he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.' Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.

But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

'I only got a dollar out of the $20,'declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!'

'Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too.

It's unfair that he got ten times more than I got' 'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!'

'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics
University of Georgia

For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
 
When a politician says he will only raise taxes on the rich he is not being honest. This shows why that's the case.
 
Then reality sets in. The 10th guy paying $49 per beer gets into local politics or pays the current local politicians to pass a law that for every beer he purchases, $47.50 gets instantly credited from the bar bank account to his personal account in the Cayman Islands. It immediately starts earning tax-free interest.

Then, with his $49 per beer receipts he writes off as a tax deduction. With this set-up the bar quickly is in the red and has to start rising prices, then laying off employees. All the while the 10th guy "paying" $49 a beer is whining that he won't be able to afford to drive his Bentley to the bar anymore and "support" all the people who don't contribute anything to their beer consumption that *he* "pays" for.

With the bar now closed, people out of work, distributors not delivering and brewrys not producing, the federal government steps.

The Feds borrow massive money from China to help pay for the unemployed, prop up the distributors and beer makers and give incentives, tax deductions and grants to the bar.

Now that the bar has reopened, the 10th guy can now stop importing his own personal beer from Singapore, drive his Bentley back to the bar and start "paying" $49 per beer again while the bottom 4 of 10 dead-beats(who worked their hands to the bone for 10 hours a day) pay "nothing".

It's good to have friends.
 
Originally Posted By: Kernel Potter
Then reality sets in. The 10th guy paying $49 per beer gets into local politics or pays the current local politicians to pass a law that for every beer he purchases, $47.50 gets instantly credited from the bar bank account to his personal account in the Cayman Islands. It immediately starts earning tax-free interest.

Then, with his $49 per beer receipts he writes off as a tax deduction. With this set-up the bar quickly is in the red and has to start rising prices, then laying off employees. All the while the 10th guy "paying" $49 a beer is whining that he won't be able to afford to drive his Bentley to the bar anymore and "support" all the people who don't contribute anything to their beer consumption that *he* "pays" for.

With the bar now closed, people out of work, distributors not delivering and brewrys not producing, the federal government steps.

The Feds borrow massive money from China to help pay for the unemployed, prop up the distributors and beer makers and give incentives, tax deductions and grants to the bar.

Now that the bar has reopened, the 10th guy can now stop importing his own personal beer from Singapore, drive his Bentley back to the bar and start "paying" $49 per beer again while the bottom 4 of 10 dead-beats(who worked their hands to the bone for 10 hours a day) pay "nothing".

It's good to have friends.



I know what you mean. Imagine how surprised I was to find out that one of our former Presidents (whose wife is a Senator from NY who ran in the primaries this year) has just such an off-shore account to avoid paying taxes on his lucrative speaking fees.
The motto is "paying a 'fair share' of taxes is for other people".
 
The only "rich" person I know of in history that actively avoided tax shelters and offshore accounts was Elvis. He completely felt that it was everyones patriotic duty to pay whatever Uncle Sam felt you owed. If you were poor, the taxes you pay should be in direct proportion to your income, same as the rich. Many times his accountants would try to funnel his money into the Caymans, a practice that he viewed as un-American.

He may have had a lot of other faults, but the IRS surely approved of him!
 
Originally Posted By: kingrob
The only "rich" person I know of in history that actively avoided tax shelters and offshore accounts was Elvis. He completely felt that it was everyones patriotic duty to pay whatever Uncle Sam felt you owed. If you were poor, the taxes you pay should be in direct proportion to your income, same as the rich. Many times his accountants would try to funnel his money into the Caymans, a practice that he viewed as un-American.

He may have had a lot of other faults, but the IRS surely approved of him!



My problem is with people who essentially say "Do as I say not as I do." This is the height of hypocrisy. One well known political family from Hyannisport, Mass has avoided paying their fair share "through an intricate web of trusts (set up in Fiji) and private foundations, they have kept most of the family pie from ever ending up in the hands of the IRS."***

***'Do as I Say (Not as I Do)" by Peter Schweizer on pg. 81
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top