dnewton3
Staff member
I have been a Glock certified armorer for 12 years now. I have models 19,26,22,23,27,35,29,21. Clearly, I'm biased, so you'll have to take my view with a grain of salt. I own many other revolvers and pistols as well, but Glock is my clear choice. Also, it's my assigned duty weapon at the Sheriff's Office.
Glocks do have safeties, but they are "passive" in that you don't have to think about activating/deactivating them for the weapon to be safe, or fire. For me, that's the best.
I have a mdl 23, but I don't carry it. I favor the 10mm with full pressure loads, although the 10mm is a dying breed that never really caught on. I suspect the .357Sig variants will be the same way soon. In the US market, the 9mm succeeds because it's very cost effective to shoot, and the .45 still holds on with it's "big ol' hole" mentality. The .40s&w seems to have found the middle ground for a lot of people.
My personal opinion is that the 19, 23, and 32 are a nice compromise between size, weight, and accuracy. If that's what you seek, you'll like the 23. Like nearly evertyhing else in life, it's a compromise.
Glocks do have safeties, but they are "passive" in that you don't have to think about activating/deactivating them for the weapon to be safe, or fire. For me, that's the best.
I have a mdl 23, but I don't carry it. I favor the 10mm with full pressure loads, although the 10mm is a dying breed that never really caught on. I suspect the .357Sig variants will be the same way soon. In the US market, the 9mm succeeds because it's very cost effective to shoot, and the .45 still holds on with it's "big ol' hole" mentality. The .40s&w seems to have found the middle ground for a lot of people.
My personal opinion is that the 19, 23, and 32 are a nice compromise between size, weight, and accuracy. If that's what you seek, you'll like the 23. Like nearly evertyhing else in life, it's a compromise.