FP60 use and oil contamination?

[AzFireGuy79]

I am considering FP60 after hearing alot of positive results with its continued use. Has anyone had any issues with it contaminating the oil over time?

 

[JHZR2]

Read the dyson and molakule reports as well as the statements from a while back in the archives. FP60 and techron are the only two adds that have no apparent wear-inducing effects.

There may be others, but based upon testing, those two stood out...

JMH

 

[televascular]

I just finished my gallon of FP60 and started on the FP+. Apparently the "+" variety doesn't use a petroleum base and leaves behind less combustion byproduct.

It shows. The FP60 is viscous, while FP+ flows like water.

 

[-SyN-]

Agrees with with JHZR2: I remember Terry @ Dyson Analysis saying the FP60 was the only fuel additive at that time that he had tested that didn't contribute to wear within the engine. Now that it contains a Bio-Based Additive. I think they just improved their product that much more.

Use with the up most confidence. I've been using FP60 and now FP60plus for a few yrs now. Not one of my UOAs have come back showing excessive wear from this addtive.

Their LC20 is a great product as well.

 

[Titan]

Originally Posted By: -SyN-

Use with the up most confidence.
\\

I agree, except I use it with the Utmost confidence. B-)

 

[AzFireGuy79]

Awesome! I just ordered a gallon of it the other day. I was told by rick over at LCD that it would be best to use the FP60 for my intended 2-stroke application (yamaha outboard) and also in my cars. I think I might just order some FP+ for my cars eventually and use the FP60 on the boat and a few other smaller engines. Thanks for the info guys. Happy fathers day

 

[-SyN-]

Well: That's what I get for skipping out on over 1/2 my grammer classes and going fishing.
The most important thing is?---->My Kids still Love Me!!!