Toyota Diesel Bearing Problems

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Messages
4,375
Location
Camas, WA
Dunno where the thread went but there was one on Toyota diesel bearings and how 'non-Japanese oil' was essentially the cause of the problem. It looks like Toyota may have had a bearing problem, a couple of different suppliers where one supplier had problems, it appears that possibly overlapping that problem was a lesser crankshaft problem, and in fact some people were suggesting that using a synthetic produced less of a problem.

A more interesting claim by the gentleman suggesting that 'non-Japanese oil' was the problem is that big oil threatened to kill people who were trying to solve the problem, and UOA samples were stolen. 60 Minutes, 20/20, the New Zealand govenrment, universities and ohers were involved, but all evidently dropped the issue (did anyone see this on 60 Minutes ?) to avoid being killed. Bitogers unite ! Fight big oil with your UOAs before a monstrous conspiracy can contaminate our precious mechanical fluids.



http://www.lonards-automotives.com.au/landcruiser.html

Rust wasn't an issue with the 80 series but however it has its problems. Gearbox's require the correct grade oil otherwise they will crunch when changing, mainly 2nd and 3rd. Front inner axle seals leak and they are heavy on front CV joints due to the constant 4wd. The 1HDT engine had big end bearing dramas. Some bearings delaminated and most were rebuilt by Toyota. The problem being that Toyota had 2 suppliers of bearings, one lot were faulty and the other lot weren't. The only problem was that Toyota didn't know who's bearings went into what cars so it was a warranty fix on demand.


http://www.markerink.org/WJM/HTML/80bigend.htm

We're talking different things. The problem you were experiencing was faulty machining of the crankshaft. It's seen on 1HZ's and 1HD-FT's. It seems that it's more apparent on the 1HD-FT, probably because of the sharper power stroke. That said, you're seeing symptoms as opposed to the big end bearing problem of the 1HD-T. The motor runs fine with no symptoms. When you do hear something it's invariably too late.



> Could this be why all your 1HD-T bearings are failing???? ;-) Well actually, those running on Mobil 1 don't seem to suffer the problem.



The NZ Commerce Commision, the ACCC (Australia's version of a commerce commission), 60 minutes, 20/20, Automobile Association's, some manufacturers and some University engineering departments were contacted to discuss the problem and what to do about it. The general consensus from most of the organisations contacted was this is way too big for us and we are not prepared to confront multinational oil companies. The other common feedback was be very careful you are treading on very powerful toes.Further along lab samples started disappearing on route to be lab tested, not completely though somewhere in transit they were being opened and the empty box being sent on to the lab, and then the lab would contact the sender to say why did you send us an empty box. The people involved in the study and there families started to get messages leave the oil alone, stop this research. The people involved in the study were then informed to cease and desist or they would be killed at this point research was abandoned. It appeared that the research was upsetting someone alot. Regards, Craig.BE Mech
 
you mean toyota doesnt love its consumers and is looking out for their best with a totally wonderful world standard product?

Say it aint so.

JMH
 
"Not sure if it is the same issue as referenced by Shannow in this thread."

"...1992 manufactured Toyota Landcruiser 4x4 Turbo Diesel Station Wagon, with the IHD-T Factory turbo engine."

Same vehicle, diesel engine type, range of years with the problem bearings, and claims about the problem essentially being not using 'Japanese type HDEOs'. It appears that it wasn't a propane problem, it was Toyota bearing problems, one almost always mentioned with that model.
 
the official 'fix' was 3000+ppm calcium.
If you search there are a few threads on here where Shannow and I discuss the Japanese diesel oil 'problem'

I've been running Delvac 1 in Nissan Patrol (equivalent to a Land Cruiser) with the TD42T engine for 180,000km now (total km is 280,000) with excellent UOA's, and better than the 'recommended' oils.
 
Was there a statement from Toyota on the issue ? It seems to have been handled as quietly as possible.

http://forum.difflock.com/viewtopic.php?p=34187&highlight=&sid=6352aea85bbcf1e424bef5ac0dd4389e

Dave the reason the bearings give out has long been a subject of debate because Toyota have never made an official statement.
So what is known is only snippets of info from Toyota mechanics and and bits and pieces leaked from dealers
Some believe it was a batch of badly machined cranks,others have claimed the original cranks were too light and vibrated and of course the bad bearing theory.
ACL bearings from OZ were a popular replacement bearing as it was believed they used a harder sacrificial coating on the bearing.
My guess is the replacement toyota ones are probably up to scratch by now.



http://forums.overlander.com.au/viewtopi...3649c65b14a1e6b

The big end problem was never a RECALL as recalls are a safety related item

If toyota identifies a problem that is not safety related but may have durability concerns they do a customer satisifaction exercise C S I as in the v6 4 runner head gaskets

The big end problem was not either of these but when it became well known on the internet what was supposed to happen was if a customer came to a dealer with a concern the dealer would as a retail job remove the big end shells & inspect them

If excessive wear was found the dealer would submit a out of warranty consideration to toyota stating the vehicle details & klms & toyota would then decide if they were going to offer any assistance with the replacement cost

As i said this was a retail job until any assistance was offered
 
Originally Posted By: 1sttruck
A more interesting claim by the gentleman suggesting that 'non-Japanese oil' was the problem is that big oil threatened to kill people who were trying to solve the problem, and UOA samples were stolen. 60 Minutes, 20/20, the New Zealand govenrment, universities and ohers were involved, but all evidently dropped the issue (did anyone see this on 60 Minutes ?) to avoid being killed.
That's quite the claim. Do you think it's true? It sounds too odd to be believable.
 
"That's quite the claim. Do you think it's true? It sounds too odd to be believable."

Yes, a bit odd, odd enough to taint suggestions that it's a 'non-Japanese oil' problem as opposed to being a Toyota problem. It seems like a mystery that bitogers would jump all over:

1. Big oil threatening to kill people. People around here seem to despise Exxon-Mobil, to the point that they might recommend a no detergent single grade oil over M1.

2. UOAs being stolen. People live an die for UOAs, so being able to use them to fight big oil is a huge opportunity to be a hero.

3. Preserving the sanctity of Japenese vehicle reliability. There is what seems to be a bias that believes that eveything Japanese is always reliable, so protecting that belief is important; no matter what it is never a Japanese vehicle problem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top