I've had mixed feelings on the topic of which motor oil is best. So much of the information available is based on anecdotal personal accounts or manufacturer's (buy my product) claims.
I checked the Owner's manual for both Bev's Windstar and my Expedition. Both state that the motor oil must meet Ford Spec WSS-M2C153-H. The spec generally states the oil must be 5W-20 and meet ILSAC GF-3 requirements. It also states other requirements, see http://www.ilma.org/resources/ford_2004_my.pdf . Therefore my minimal requirement for purchasing motor oil is that the product data sheet states Ford Spec WSS-M2C153-H is met. If the product data sheet states higher requirements are also met (e.g. ILSAC GF-4 and API service SM), this is a plus.
Some of the high priced synthetic oils on the market don't meet the Ford Spec and some do. E.g. non of the Valvoline Synthetics meet the Ford Spec, although their All-Climate oil (offered in 5W-20, ILSAC GF-4, API SM) may meet it, but for some reason Valvoline isn't stating so on their product bottle / data sheets - which may be a huge marketing mistake. Castrol, Pennzoil, Mobil, and other oil manufacturers state that they meet the Ford spec for their 5W-20's on both the product bottle and data sheets.
I'll use Castrol as an example, although other manufacturers could also be substituted.
- My quandary is: do I buy Castrol GTX (which exceeds WSS-M2C153-H, ILSAC GF-4, and API SM) for $1.95 per quart, OR do I buy Castrol SYNTEC which exceeds the same requirements for twice the price?
- Is it worth the extra money since my vehicles are not used in extreme service conditions, not exposed to extreme climates, nor am I looking to extend the oil change interval?
- Is there data to show how much longer an Expedition/Windstar engine will last on full synthetic Vs dinosaur oil? And does it matter since the rest of the vehicle will probably fall apart before the engine wears out anyway?
I checked the Owner's manual for both Bev's Windstar and my Expedition. Both state that the motor oil must meet Ford Spec WSS-M2C153-H. The spec generally states the oil must be 5W-20 and meet ILSAC GF-3 requirements. It also states other requirements, see http://www.ilma.org/resources/ford_2004_my.pdf . Therefore my minimal requirement for purchasing motor oil is that the product data sheet states Ford Spec WSS-M2C153-H is met. If the product data sheet states higher requirements are also met (e.g. ILSAC GF-4 and API service SM), this is a plus.
Some of the high priced synthetic oils on the market don't meet the Ford Spec and some do. E.g. non of the Valvoline Synthetics meet the Ford Spec, although their All-Climate oil (offered in 5W-20, ILSAC GF-4, API SM) may meet it, but for some reason Valvoline isn't stating so on their product bottle / data sheets - which may be a huge marketing mistake. Castrol, Pennzoil, Mobil, and other oil manufacturers state that they meet the Ford spec for their 5W-20's on both the product bottle and data sheets.
I'll use Castrol as an example, although other manufacturers could also be substituted.
- My quandary is: do I buy Castrol GTX (which exceeds WSS-M2C153-H, ILSAC GF-4, and API SM) for $1.95 per quart, OR do I buy Castrol SYNTEC which exceeds the same requirements for twice the price?
- Is it worth the extra money since my vehicles are not used in extreme service conditions, not exposed to extreme climates, nor am I looking to extend the oil change interval?
- Is there data to show how much longer an Expedition/Windstar engine will last on full synthetic Vs dinosaur oil? And does it matter since the rest of the vehicle will probably fall apart before the engine wears out anyway?