Originally Posted By: Gary Allan
Well, Spitty, I won't kick you in the side here
It's just that many find it hard to figure the objection to $60 with the potential gains. Many of us are tightwads in measuring things of scale here on certain items. Most of us manage to save $1000's in DIY mode ..yet acknowledge that you can't hit any repair shop for even the most minor of needs without topping $100 for next to nothing. Most of us are wondering how you can resist trying it out of curiosity (most of us aren't here on BITOG because we have no interest in such matters) ..which is why you're probably seeing some of the "are you kidding me?" type responses.
If I was in a better financial disposition in terms of disposable cash, I'd have Frank send you two bottles just so you could find out. I'd be curious to see if you can justify a tear down and rebuild after you did either two conventional treatments or one of the heavy dose experiments that myself and a few others have tried with excellent success.
I do admire your willingness to regard an engine rebuild as I would a brake job. You're obviously not lazy (I like to call myself an "efficiency expert"
), but even you must surely not enjoy toil for toil's sake (some do
)
As far as time vs. mileage, I would imagine that some fuel component would work ..much like an hour meter would for a stationary installation. I'm of the impression that it requires so many circulation cycles "at temp" (probably) to be most effective. Fuel usage tends to take most operational conditions into account.
OK As I said I don't intend to hang out hear, but for those of you who have been courteous, perhaps I should set the record straight; I have worked a good part of my life as a motor engineer (my apprenticeship was with British Anzani) I am now in semi retirement and operate a Shade Tree Garage serving classic British car owners. Pulling and rebuilding a low tech engine like a 22R does not scare me, the machine shop I use owes me a favour (or two) and this Truck is not my primary transport.
As I have stated I bought the truck a few months back, and cosmetically it's in Mint condition. However I suspected that mechanically somthing was amiss. On a quick investigation (last week) I found the underside of the valve cover to have the characteristic 'Brown Crud' brought about by coolant in the oil, the engine appears to have a new cyl head gasket and a new Heater hose (all other hosed are quite hard after 24 years)
I did a scope check of the cyl bores (Fibre optic camera through the spark plug hole) Cyls 2 & 3 show a band of Rust pitting (Coolant has been sitting in the bores from a head gasket leak)
I'm surprised this engine does not burn more oil!
I suspect that the contaminated oil has taken it's toll on the engine bearings (oil pressure is low even with 15w-40 oil) and I would proberbly hear a knock if it were not for a noisy timing chain. Perhaps because of my work and background, it irks me to drive a vehicle in less than excellent condition. I could most likely get a few more K miles out of this engine, but what's the point! There is also a squeal from the clutch release bearing that should be addressed.
Pulling the engine and rebuilding it with an overbore will cost me about $300 and about 20 hours shop time, which for me, at this time of year is not a big deal.
As I have said, I'm sure ARx is a reputable product and has it's uses, But, (and maybe Frank and Sprintman would even agree?) It's not 'A New engine in a bottle'
I may take the kind offer, but NOT for this engine! I do have a client with a really nasty Austin Healey BN2, with his consent I will test it on his car at no charge (If that engine ends up leaking more than it does already, I do not want to be held responsible)
I have no intention of 'Joining in the Game' as Frank would put it, I have found the arragance and disrespect I have received on this forum a little hard to forgive, But if my friend and client agrees to this test I will report the results here.
Forgive me if I choose not respond to further posts.