I was going for general lifestyle....assuming active people who are on the go (burning, thus normalizing their blood chemistry) are less prone to diabetes.IDK how their employment would make a difference?
I was going for general lifestyle....assuming active people who are on the go (burning, thus normalizing their blood chemistry) are less prone to diabetes.IDK how their employment would make a difference?
I am a firm believer in the nuts and bolts mechanism. And trust me, most of my life was statistics and cause and effect. Until the solid research of mechanism is found and validated repetitively, I stay in the "get off my lawn" camp with most all the studies.Obviously being active, eating well, etc - leads to a longer life. Not in dispute.
But in regards to the OP about altitude - if you look at somewhere like Maine or Oregon or California, where people are also active, if they have still a higher incidence of diabetes then there may be something to the altitude thing? Just saying, the NIH tries to normalize these things.
South Carolina has likely the highest diabetes rate. Is it because were all fat (very possible), or at sea level, or does it have something to do with 40% of our population is ethnicities that have a higher incidence of it everywhere? Likely all of these reasons?
If you have a dog you live longer. Is it because of the dog? Probably not - its likely due to lowered stress. The blue zones are in places like Okinawa and Costa Rica - sign me up. Yes there active, but have lower stress vs someone in NYC.
You can normalize studies for age, etc. But its more difficult to normalize for behavior and stress, for exmple.
That's what the study gets at, exercise is great, but with hypoxia, it's even more beneficial. Which would lead me to speculate, that even without exercise, there is a benefit to living at a higher altitude.But in regards to the OP about altitude - if you look at somewhere like Maine or Oregon or California, where people are also active, if they have still a higher incidence of diabetes then there may be something to the altitude thing? Just saying, the NIH tries to normalize these things.
Was it the "news" (term used loosely), or the NIH? Not saying the NIH can't be full of BS, but the bar for a NIH study to be published is a little higher, at least assuming there are no current events requiring it.A couple months ago the headlines were screaming "Red meat causes diabetes". The study was based on food survey questionnaires. From previous months and years.
It was the news. I cannot remember the study. And again agree, NIH has a slightly higher bar, than some of the stuff out of Harvard.Was it the "news" (term used loosely), or the NIH? Not saying the NIH can't be full of BS, but the bar for a NIH study to be published is a little higher, at least assuming there are no current events requiring it.
Since you brought up mitochondria, you should check out Steven Gundry’s Unlocking the Keto Code… he goes in depth on “mitochondrial uncoupling” which he says is the key to health and weight loss.Considering all of these peoples mitochondria probably work the same, IDK how their employment would make a difference?
I'm not a statistician so I don't really understand the details of your observation but it seems the correlation is pretty strong here and the science makes sense.
Just looked up cancer and elevation:
"Humans living at high altitude (HA) are exposed to chronic (hypobaric) hypoxia. Despite the permanent stress of hypoxic exposure, humans populating HA areas have reduced cancer mortality over a broad spectrum of cancer types. In fact, the majority of the physiological adaptive processes at HA occurring in response to hypoxia might be the driving force for reduced cancer mortality at HA."
High Altitude and Cancer Mortality - PubMed
Thiersch, Markus, and Erik R. Swenson. High altitude and cancer mortality. High Alt Med Biol 19:116-123, 2018.-Humans living at high altitude (HA) are exposed to chronic (hypobaric) hypoxia. Despite the permanent stress of hypoxic exposure, humans populating HA areas have reduced cancer...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Those are amazing results! Thank you for the book, I will check it out.Certain foods and eating behaviors go a long way towards mitochondrial uncoupling… I started using the methods and foods he described on Jan 3rd of this year, and as of yesterday morning I was down exactly 20 pounds in 23 days. At this rate I’ll lose what I want in about 4 months.