"... And before someone jumps on him, and I'm sure someone will, dnewton3 is using these mileage values as comparison values - as conservative base points."
That is exactly correct, Garak. This was a contrast of the minimum limits most people would go comfortably with each choice.
My point is that lubricant selection should be based upon your expected maintenance plan. Lubricants are designed and manufactured to operate for a pre-determined service factor, and depending upon your opeartional conditions, have a limited life factor.
Any oil can go a short distance, and no oil can go forever. Therefore, it's a matter of matching your lube to your OCI or vice-versa. It is just as foolish to waste money on an over-capable product as it is to risk damage from an under-capable product.
So, coming yet again full circle to the OPs question. Does he really "need" an HDEO for this application? Probaly not; dino PCMOs will easily protect his investment quite well for normal operation and OCIs. If he chooses HDEO, that's OK, but I would suggest longer OCIs, (and UOAs), to make it worth the extra expense. At this point, it becomes a fiscal balancing act for the added cost of the HDEO (and UOA) versus the OCI duration.
I use 10w-30 dino Rotella in my 1966 289 v-8 Mustang. I drive it very infrequently; probably less than 300 miles a year! I only OCI once every 3 to 4 years. Why? Because I'm confident that the added benefits from HDEO (higher TBN and better soot control) compliment the extended time use. Certainly mileage isn't the issue; it's the risk of long term contamination and storage. Also, it's carb'd and not fuel injected. And let's not forget that tolerances were not as tight 40+ years ago. So here, the HDEO makes sense. It's not a matter of wear protection, but contamination control.
But in the OPs situation, for a frequent driver that is fuel injected, using normal OCI durations, PCMO is a fine match, and anything else is a waste, UNLESS the OCI is extended.
MATCH YOUR LUBE TO YOUR EXPECTED OCI DURATION, FOLKS!