- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,799
Okay ..I bought a Belkin Wireless "G" router. Cheap enough. Now the tap dancing with the "relationship" that Belkin appears to need between the router and the device is interesting (requires hardwiring to get it to work ..sorta) ..but we got everything functioning.
Here's the issue. Now my new Toshiba laptop has its own integrated wireless ..gets a great signal from less then 3 feet away (big deal) ...but a mere 50 ft away ...my older Toshiba, with the matching Belkin USB antenna gets a VERY LOW signal. I thought that the difference was due to USB 1.0 on and 2.0 ..so I used my 2.0 PMCIA adapter and graduated to LOW signal in the same 50ft span.
Is this what I should expect from just about all wireless routers? My house is hard wired ..but I had some issue with the D-Link communications (or so I perceived). It has long reached its "end of life" support from D-Link and stuff ..so, since my new Toshiba is setup for wireless ..I figured that I'd go that route.
Now I've seen those wireless "range extenders" ..but they're not cheap compared to the more simple offerings. My documentation boasts of "up to 400' range" ..but obviously, certain conditions and restrictions apply (zero density between the two points, no electronic emissions between the two points, no rain or barometric pressure fluctuations ..etc..etc).
Now I haven't taken my newer Toshiba and moved around the house with it. It's my desktop for the most part and I'm really tired of cable hook up and un-hooking for a bit now (Belkin is REALLY WEIRD about this "relationship" ritual you have to go through).
Your thoughts and experiences
Thanks in advance.
Here's the issue. Now my new Toshiba laptop has its own integrated wireless ..gets a great signal from less then 3 feet away (big deal) ...but a mere 50 ft away ...my older Toshiba, with the matching Belkin USB antenna gets a VERY LOW signal. I thought that the difference was due to USB 1.0 on and 2.0 ..so I used my 2.0 PMCIA adapter and graduated to LOW signal in the same 50ft span.
Is this what I should expect from just about all wireless routers? My house is hard wired ..but I had some issue with the D-Link communications (or so I perceived). It has long reached its "end of life" support from D-Link and stuff ..so, since my new Toshiba is setup for wireless ..I figured that I'd go that route.
Now I've seen those wireless "range extenders" ..but they're not cheap compared to the more simple offerings. My documentation boasts of "up to 400' range" ..but obviously, certain conditions and restrictions apply (zero density between the two points, no electronic emissions between the two points, no rain or barometric pressure fluctuations ..etc..etc).
Now I haven't taken my newer Toshiba and moved around the house with it. It's my desktop for the most part and I'm really tired of cable hook up and un-hooking for a bit now (Belkin is REALLY WEIRD about this "relationship" ritual you have to go through).
Your thoughts and experiences
Thanks in advance.